Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan Wolfe wrote:
One thing that works real well is to transmit near the x-ray radar band where you have privileges. The traffic may slow down a bit as you set off the radar detectors :-) A number of years ago (I forget exactly what year) a ham friend of mine discovered that he could cause a new Cadillac to stall simply by keying his transmitter as the Cadillac was passing his camper. That design problem was probably fixed rather quickly. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote in
et: Stefan Wolfe wrote: One thing that works real well is to transmit near the x-ray radar band where you have privileges. The traffic may slow down a bit as you set off the radar detectors :-) A number of years ago (I forget exactly what year) a ham friend of mine discovered that he could cause a new Cadillac to stall simply by keying his transmitter as the Cadillac was passing his camper. That design problem was probably fixed rather quickly. Back in the '70s I was working on a project that saw me reading papers on the effects of EMR on various things. Amongst the papers was one dealing with the susceptibility of the electronic anti-skid technology introduced on heavy transport vehicles to meet (then) newer more stingent braking distances. The braking systems were susceptible to ingress of RF, resulting in wheel lockups. You can imagine the results of a 22 wheeler at highway speed when a chook alongside comes up with "Breaker, Breaker, any taker?" and locks up most of the wheels on the transport. I read other papers on rear wheel lockups in a certain brand of passenger vehicle due to RF induced downshift of the (electronically controlled) automatic transmission at highway speeds. The EMC issue seems better understood by vehicle manufacturers today, though you still hear of RF triggered airbag deployments from time to time. I won't go into the papers on effects on aircraft, some of you may fly from time to time! A paper on propagation of EM waves through rectangular slots in thin sheet metal looks innocuous enough until you realise that it is talking about an aircraft window (in the days when almost all aircraft had a metal skin). Owen |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Owen: Well do I remember the onset of EMC awareness that came with
the early anti-skid systems. One horror case took place in Chicago with a bus. One of the many short bridges in Chicago has metal decking and a bus stop at the far end of the bridge. The bridge also is aligned with the Sears tower (in downtown Chicago it is difficult not to be aligned with some strong RF radiator - it is worse than a carrier). Bus starts onto the bridge. Patrons stand to get off at the next stop. Breaks fail while on bridge. Driver fully asserts the brakes. Bus arrives at the end of the bridge and the brakes start to work. People go flying. I was a witness of the (very early and crude) method used to test systems. Not anymore! Today, whole cars are zapped from all directions, all frequencies, and at huge amplitudes. A huge effort was made to find out what sort of signals a car might encounter. I once rode in a van all the way to Chicago glued to a SA to record strong signals. The worst that I saw was a VOR signal (few hundred watts at ground level with a very good radial screen and near the road) and a CB signal. Others in the project measured at VOA and LORAN sites. An FM broadcast antenna was found to radiate a huge signal onto a public street - see, you know that antenna design would be worked into the discussion - in this case an incompetent, but not unusual, antenna design. At work, we have a big RF amplifier used to zap devices in order to find out where they die. Had to get a waiver from FCC because, even though the amp requires three-phase, it could be used on 27 MHz. Critical equipment is much more EMC capable today. 73, Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... Cecil Moore wrote in et: Stefan Wolfe wrote: One thing that works real well is to transmit near the x-ray radar band where you have privileges. The traffic may slow down a bit as you set off the radar detectors :-) A number of years ago (I forget exactly what year) a ham friend of mine discovered that he could cause a new Cadillac to stall simply by keying his transmitter as the Cadillac was passing his camper. That design problem was probably fixed rather quickly. Back in the '70s I was working on a project that saw me reading papers on the effects of EMR on various things. Amongst the papers was one dealing with the susceptibility of the electronic anti-skid technology introduced on heavy transport vehicles to meet (then) newer more stingent braking distances. The braking systems were susceptible to ingress of RF, resulting in wheel lockups. You can imagine the results of a 22 wheeler at highway speed when a chook alongside comes up with "Breaker, Breaker, any taker?" and locks up most of the wheels on the transport. I read other papers on rear wheel lockups in a certain brand of passenger vehicle due to RF induced downshift of the (electronically controlled) automatic transmission at highway speeds. The EMC issue seems better understood by vehicle manufacturers today, though you still hear of RF triggered airbag deployments from time to time. I won't go into the papers on effects on aircraft, some of you may fly from time to time! A paper on propagation of EM waves through rectangular slots in thin sheet metal looks innocuous enough until you realise that it is talking about an aircraft window (in the days when almost all aircraft had a metal skin). Owen |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen is right-- When a radio-man , had a guy come
into the shop, complaining about his truck stalling when he transmitted. (freq around 160 MHz) Ran his truck, (idle), keyed rig, NO Problem! Said to take it for test run- in low gear, (abt. 2000-2500 rpm), and keyed the transmitter, the rig STALLED! Wasn't a problem when I installed radio- turned out they had modified the truck to an Electronic Ignition! This around 25 years ago. Tried various cures but, they went back to the original "Points & coil" system and worked fine! (this before these were common on vehicles). Translation: YES, can effect a vehicle, but times have changed: might not be so supsceptable now a days (more problems with the built in computer that they seem to like to hide-- drill a hole in these- turn a car into a thrashing machine! ). But BOTH can cause problems. btw the power level for the problem was a 50 Watt radio. and the SECOND problem (think they more standardized now), could be placed as the manufacturers stated, (ANYWHERE in the vehicle) ! Now days must be within 3 foot of the OBD2 Plug (used for smogging)! At least in the U.S. As info, Jim NN7K Owen Duffy wrote: That design problem was probably fixed rather quickly. Back in the '70s I was working on a project that saw me reading papers on the effects of EMR on various things. Amongst the papers was one dealing with the susceptibility of the electronic anti-skid technology introduced on heavy transport vehicles to meet (then) newer more stingent braking distances. The braking systems were susceptible to ingress of RF, resulting in wheel lockups. You can imagine the results of a 22 wheeler at highway speed when a chook alongside comes up with "Breaker, Breaker, any taker?" and locks up most of the wheels on the transport. I read other papers on rear wheel lockups in a certain brand of passenger vehicle due to RF induced downshift of the (electronically controlled) automatic transmission at highway speeds. The EMC issue seems better understood by vehicle manufacturers today, though you still hear of RF triggered airbag deployments from time to time. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've heard that as well with Japanese cars. I think the computer gets
RFI'd out and shuts down the ignition system. Maybe something for the Mythbusters TV show to check out... Scott Cecil Moore wrote: Stefan Wolfe wrote: One thing that works real well is to transmit near the x-ray radar band where you have privileges. The traffic may slow down a bit as you set off the radar detectors :-) A number of years ago (I forget exactly what year) a ham friend of mine discovered that he could cause a new Cadillac to stall simply by keying his transmitter as the Cadillac was passing his camper. That design problem was probably fixed rather quickly. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|