Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote in
: Maybe the lack of responses is because of the obscurity of the "s-plane summation". I've never heard of it, and a web search brought only one or two possible hits from publications I'd have to buy in order to view. Any principle with that low a profile on the web is pretty esoteric. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Roy, to kick it along a little... The technique calls for making sets of measurements with the antenna in three orthogonal orientations and summing the z, y and z plane values to an "s plane" value to represent maximum field strength. I think the summation that is typically used is the square root of the sum of the squares. The technique suits automated measurement where a series of perhaps hundreds of measurements at different frequencies are made, the antenna is manually changed, and the series repeated etc. Software is then used to process the logged measurements. Clearly there is an issue about the temporaral nature of separate measurements in each plane at a given frequency. I was interested in any standards or regulatory "procedures" that may exist that describe / mandate such technique. Most procedures that I have found just call for orienting the antenna for maximum response rather than the x,z,z trick. I would like to understand its application better to for a view about the appropriateness to particular applications. I suspect its main value is in automated EMC data capture. I am still on the BPL measurement tram! Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Advice for 75m Mobile Field Strength measurements | Antenna | |||
FCC Field Strength Measurements | Homebrew | |||
Calibratable Field Strength Meter? | Homebrew | |||
Calibratable Field Strength Meter? | Homebrew |