Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's not clear what the objective is. NEC and EZNEC have the ability to
sum the power from the field at all calculated points. This is used in its "average gain" calculation which reports the ratio of total power in the field to power applied to the array. (NEC, but not EZNEC, also applies another factor of two when evaluating a system over a ground plane.) You can extract this total power value by multiplying the reported average gain by the power from the sources (and the additional factor of two if necessary). I don't know if this is the end result you're after, but it sounds like something in the right direction. You could of course analyze an antenna with two orthogonal elevation plots and an azimuth plot to generate data for three orthogonal planes, then sum them manually or with a simple program. I have no idea what the meaning or use of the resulting number might be, though. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Owen Duffy wrote: Roy, to kick it along a little... The technique calls for making sets of measurements with the antenna in three orthogonal orientations and summing the z, y and z plane values to an "s plane" value to represent maximum field strength. I think the summation that is typically used is the square root of the sum of the squares. The technique suits automated measurement where a series of perhaps hundreds of measurements at different frequencies are made, the antenna is manually changed, and the series repeated etc. Software is then used to process the logged measurements. Clearly there is an issue about the temporaral nature of separate measurements in each plane at a given frequency. I was interested in any standards or regulatory "procedures" that may exist that describe / mandate such technique. Most procedures that I have found just call for orienting the antenna for maximum response rather than the x,z,z trick. I would like to understand its application better to for a view about the appropriateness to particular applications. I suspect its main value is in automated EMC data capture. I am still on the BPL measurement tram! Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Advice for 75m Mobile Field Strength measurements | Antenna | |||
FCC Field Strength Measurements | Homebrew | |||
Calibratable Field Strength Meter? | Homebrew | |||
Calibratable Field Strength Meter? | Homebrew |