Some time ago the many pseudo expert on antennas on this
thread PooHoo.d the idea that Static fields and electromechanical
fields
were connected. Any body can go thru the archives of a few weeks ago
to find out who they were. Some have also argued with me over skin
depth
but after the two latest "deep" threads that I posted I realise that
there are
more "pseudo" experts than I thought, Some obviously never got out of
high
school. Pretty much everybody scorned the idea that antennas could be
made better than the yagi because all was known let alone a completely
new
line of designs which were not made up of parassitic elements let
alone of
mainly resonant elements in cluster form for choice of polarity. I was
called
a lot of bad names plus all the put up or shut up by people who
wouldn't
understand it if I did supply the information.A day or so ago I
supplied all
the information albiet in an unprofessional way, on the web for all
to rebut,
especially the so called experts on this newsgroup, but where did they
hide
themselves when the evidence of Gaussian antenna connections was
placed
in front of them?
Where are the experts who refuted the idea of a revelutionary design
series?
On one of the threads I gave the web page such that anybody could
swipe
at me or apologise only to find that this group is not about antennas
it is about
having arguements for arguments sake. Anybody can go to Google and
type
the above thread title in to see the background to which I have been
criticised but the
fact is that if it isnt already in a book then it can't be true, at
least for amateurs.
Gentlemen I am sharing with the amateur community my findings on a new
breed of antennas but it seems that antenna interest has taken a
downswing
when at this point in time there is so much interest in other
polarities to what
the amateurs do not use. As I stated earlier I placed the page on
this newsgroup
\and other readers can get to it if they use this thread title in
google but if guitar
music is what you are looking for then by all means stick around for
somebody
to argue with or get in touch with AUSTRALIA to set up a water
experiment
And my all means bury your head in the sand regarding the connection
between
electrostatic fields and electromagnetic fields and yes David you can
start up
your diatribe all over again on static fields having now enunciated
that the
Corriolis force is ficticious.. Regards less of what you say yabout
what you
do in life and the antenna work you have accomplished in the company
of high
antenna experts as well as the gaurdian of an antenna testing range
you are NOT an expert.
Regards
Art Unwin