Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 22nd 07, 08:43 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 440
Default AM band Field strength predicton?

"MRW"
How did you get 3 mV/m? I tried 300 mV/m / (sqrt(1kW - 20W)).


Other things equal, the far field varies by the square root of the power
change.
If 1 kW into a given antenna system produces 300 mV/m at 1 km, then 0.1 W
into that same system produces SQRT(0.1W / 1000W) x 300 mV/m at 1 km,
which is 3 mV/m.

Are there any existing resources that talk about how much attenuation
can each ground type contribute?


The FCC charts probably are the best resource. Surface wave propagation
losses are dependent on frequency as well as ground conditions.

I don't have the experience background, yet. But in your opinion, is a
field strength of 1mV/m the absolute minimum for decent AM reception?
Also, is the fact that AM more prone to interference the reason why its
field strength requirements are higher than FM?


A good AM receiver in the absence of natural/man-made interference can
produce useful (but not highly "competitive") performance in fields of less
than 100 µV/m.

At a given value of received field strength, an FM broadcast is received
with less noise than AM because of the lower noise level at VHF frequencies,
and due to the ability of an FM receiver to the reject the a-m noise that is
present.

RF

  #2   Report Post  
Old February 22nd 07, 09:46 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
MRW MRW is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 22
Default AM band Field strength predicton?

On Feb 22, 3:43 pm, "Richard Fry" wrote:
Other things equal, the far field varies by the square root of the power
change.
If 1 kW into a given antenna system produces 300 mV/m at 1 km, then 0.1 W
into that same system produces SQRT(0.1W / 1000W) x 300 mV/m at 1 km,
which is 3 mV/m.


So in terms of the 20W test, this value at 1km would be 42.4 mV/m? If
so, how would I translate this value to another distance (e.g. 0.4 km
away)? I'm assuming that it would be greater than 42.4mV/m.

A good AM receiver in the absence of natural/man-made interference can
produce useful (but not highly "competitive") performance in fields of less
than 100 µV/m.


Would a typically AM receiver be able to pick up signals 50 uV/m in
field strength? I'm assuming that it wouldn't since the components in
the AM receiver have noise levels probably close to this, huh?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC Field Strength Measurements Me Homebrew 0 September 5th 06 10:08 PM
FCC Field Strength Measurements John, N9JG Homebrew 0 September 5th 06 08:53 PM
APRS and signal strength.. Joel Homebrew 0 January 4th 04 11:13 PM
APRS and signal strength.. Joel Homebrew 0 January 4th 04 11:13 PM
For Sale: Lafayette SWR/Power/Field Strength Meter Bill Equipment 0 December 11th 03 01:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017