Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
A is not a property of P1 or P2, and cannot be derived from them. I maintain that you cannot vectorially combine P1 and P2. P1 is a property of V1^2/Z0, A is a property of V1. P2 is a property of V2^2/Z0, A is a property of V2. There is an unbroken chain of cause and effect. It is true that one cannot directly vectorially combine P1 and P2 because P1 and P2 are not vectors. However, the ability to combine the P1 and P2 of coherent EM waves dates back to before you were born. Optical engineers didn't have the luxury of being able to measure the phase angles. All they could measure was the total amplitude. Please don't try to tell us that their total amplitude measurements were wrong throughout the 20th century and are still wrong in the 21st century. The rules for combining P1 and P2 when they are coherent are known as the irradiance equations in optics. Dr. Best applied them to RF quantities. Please reference "Optics", by Hecht, 4th edition, page 388 and Dr. Best's, "Wave Mechanics of Transmission Lines, Part 3: ..." in the Nov/Dec 2001 issue of "QEX". -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
Outside Antenna | Shortwave | |||
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |