Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 27, 3:10 am, Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: My favorite quotation by an antenna guru on this newsgroup is that "a 50 ohm antenna can be replaced by a 50 ohm resistor without changing anything". If that were true, we don't need antennas. :-) That sounds like a direct misquotation of me. Nope, it wasn't you, Ian. You are usually more careful than that. For a mismatched load, the meter will read higher in the forward direction than in the reverse - but that is purely a feature of the instrument. It all looks so plausible on the meter scale, but those are not genuine power waves flowing in opposite directions. But they are genuine energy waves flowing in opposite directions. Standing waves require two coherent energy waves flowing in opposite directions. Can you explain how to create a standing wave without two energy waves flowing in opposite directions? And remember, the two EM wave components in the standing wave cannot stand still. There's truth in what you say, Ian, but it is not the whole truth. There's no difference except frequency (and all that frequency implies) between an RF electromagnetic wave and a visible light electromagnetic wave. In fact, RF waves are covered in many physics textbooks whose subject is light. There is a wealth of information available from the field of optics that is applicable to RF waves. Visible light physicists don't have the luxury of measuring voltage or directly measuring phase. They have to rely on a power measurement of irradiance. As a result, visible light measurements are actually power measurements so we indeed do know how EM waves behave at the joules/second level. Visible light physicists found that when they superpose two coherent light waves, Ptotal = P1 + P2 + 2*SQRT(P1*P2)cos(A) where 'A' is the angle between the electric fields of the two waves. That exact same equation applies to coherent RF waves. Phasor addition is used for the superposition of two coherent RF voltages. The power equation is used to find out what happens to the power during that voltage superposition. P1 = V1^2*Z0 and P2 = V2^2*Z0 The last term in the power equation is known as the interference term and is either constructive, destructive, or zero. Since antenna radiation patterns depend upon constructive and destructive interference of EM waves in space, we hams could learn a lot from the field of physics known as optics. I'm going to be away from my computer for 48 hours. But you'll be back... :-) Yep, I'm posting from my sister's computer through my Google account. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
Outside Antenna | Shortwave | |||
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |