| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
" The solution is 4.9 dB. snip If anyone wants to challenge the 4.9 dB solution, they can impeach my reference "Reference Data for Radio Engineers," (various editions). I can supply other references that have been named in this group too, but I would suggest with tackling one authority at a time. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC I have to admit to an error in my analysis of the problem, I made a mistake with the attenuation of the line. Re analysing with the correct values gives me the following: Loss 4.78dB S11 -5.25dB Vswr as seen by the source 3.41:1 I think these values are close enough to Richard's answers to make little difference. I have not got Reference Data for Radio Engineers to hand, but it may be a graphical solution that could account for the slight discrepancy. My figures were obtained using Ansoft Designer RF Cad package. The error crept in because I did the analysis by using 5.35m of coax at 300m to get the 5.35 wavelengths, and forgot to scale the attenuation value for the coax. 73 Jeff |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
| Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
| Outside Antenna | Shortwave | |||
| WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||