| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 09:58:02 -0800, Jim Kelley
wrote: , is how is it that you were able to ascertain that this heat energy was caused by energy that was reflected from the load rather than having come directly from the power supply within the source? In the theological sense, this predicates that power never becomes dissociated from "the source." That is ambiguous, isn't it? Is that to include the batteries behind the collector supply? The power supply charging the batteries? The power grid feeding the power supply? The generator driving the grid? The Coal firing the steam spinning the generator? The sun through photosynthesis growing plants to provide the coal? The previous supernova that seeded the cosmos by which coalescence formed the sun? ...and into an infinite regression to that previous supernova? The energy dissipated is computed from the Galactic Load Line. I think it's been fairly well established that the output impedance of these things is far from 50 ohms. Can you offer what that complex number is? :-0 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
| Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
| Outside Antenna | Shortwave | |||
| WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||