Richard Clark wrote:

On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 09:58:02 -0800, Jim Kelley
wrote:


, is how is it that you were able to
ascertain that this heat energy was caused by energy that was
reflected from the load rather than having come directly from the
power supply within the source?


In the theological sense, this predicates that power never becomes
dissociated from "the source." That is ambiguous, isn't it?

Is that to include the batteries behind the collector supply? The
power supply charging the batteries? The power grid feeding the power
supply? The generator driving the grid? The Coal firing the steam
spinning the generator? The sun through photosynthesis growing plants
to provide the coal? The previous supernova that seeded the cosmos by
which coalescence formed the sun? ...and into an infinite regression
to that previous supernova?

The energy dissipated is computed from the Galactic Load Line.

Sarcasm clearly noted, and surprisingly uncalled for. I'll try asking
one more time. It is a simple metrology question: How were you able
to directly ascertain that the heat being dissipated in the source was
produced by energy being reflected from the load?

Thanks,

Jim, AC6XG