On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:28:58 -0800, Jim Kelley
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:

Is power/energy separable from its source?

What other point is there to attaching an antenna to a transmitter?

Hi Jim,

I will take that as an affirmative.

When it is generally accepted that our sources do not exhibit 50 Ohms
source resistance/impedance, what resistance/impedance do they
exhibit?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
When it is generally accepted that our sources do not exhibit 50 Ohms
source resistance/impedance, what resistance/impedance do they
exhibit?

It doesn't matter. The net power supplied by the source
is *always* the difference between the forward power
and the incident reflected power *by definition*.

The definition seems to assume that 100% of the
incident reflected power is re-reflected *as if*
a 100% re-reflection condition exists.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:36:12 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Basically nothing.

Richard Clark wrote:
When it is generally accepted that our sources do not exhibit 50 Ohms
source resistance/impedance, what resistance/impedance do they
exhibit?

To which I got no answers in stereo.

Some may sense frustration to which I once asked how much relief I
would need. Having already long anticipated a non-response (score
100% for accuracy in modeling); others may want to fumble rhetorically
with equally uninformed responses. In anticipation of that I provide
a multiple choice. Richard needs to take:
1. An aspirin;
2. A syringe of morphine;
3. Both of the above;
4. 50 Ohms of dissipation.
5. All of the above, except 3.
6. ____________

Now take that number, and divide it by the Sarcasm co-efficient.

Plot this on a graph and draw an asymptote. You now have a diagram
for a Gaussian Bundle. Find the Pointing Vector for this (it points
to the same answer you picked in the multiple choice) to verify the
authenticity of your newsreader's software design. ;-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC