LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Report Post  
Old March 2nd 07, 12:18 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,169
Default tuner - feedline - antenna question ?

Richard Clark wrote in
:

I have restricted myself to the cyclic display of powers.

....
Well, at a quick glance and noting no tabular form of data, what is
presented wouldn't reveal cyclic variation anyway for two reasons:
1. It lacks resolution (not enough places);
2. It lacks sufficient mismatch.
This is not a complaint, merely an observation because the evidence
for your example is hidden deep in the decimal places.


The graph at http://www.vk1od.net/lost/RG58sol.gif has not been labelled
for presentation, so you will need to make some allowance in reading it.

The case that is plotted is an extreme mismatch, ou you might argue
impractical, but it is extreme enought to show the effects clearly on a
graph. The x axis is displacement from the load (-ve towards the
generator).

The red line is the so called "forward power" (Real(Vf^2/Zo)) that would
be indicated by a correctly calibrated sampler like a Bird 43, but
correctly calibrated means for the actual Zo, not the nominal 50+j0.

The dashed purple line is the so called "reflected power" (Real(Vr^2/Zo))
under the same conditions.

The power at a point is shown by the cyan line.

The dashed olive line is Real(Vf^2/Zo))-Real(Vf^2/Zo) (so called forward
power - reflected power). It is not the same as as the power because it
ignores two terms of the power expansion. A Bird 43 callibrated for the
actual Zo would lead you to this line.

This is a very detailed RLGC model, and it reveals from the P(x) line
that attenuation per unit length is not constant, a result of the loss
being higher in the region of a current maximum. Nevertheless, a sampler
that responds to Vf or Vr will not expose the true power curve (due to
the two missing terms).

I have thought at times of writing an article that explains the effects
on a true practical transmission line, and what practical instruments
calibrated for 50+j0 would indicate. I doubt that it would have appeal,
people like the "reflected power is dissipated in the transmitter and may
overheat it" explanation... it is easier to swallow.

Owen


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) Zommbee Antenna 8 December 28th 06 12:53 AM
Optimising a G5RV Owen Duffy Antenna 20 October 3rd 06 06:38 PM
Outside Antenna Rikk Shortwave 25 March 6th 06 06:53 PM
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) RHF Shortwave 15 September 13th 05 08:28 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017