| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
And now one for the engineers!
How do you interpret a non-zero Poynting vector determined by static E- and H- fields? What the Poynting vector actually tells us is that the flux into any closed volume is equal to the rate of storage of energy within the volume. Since a static field has no flux into any closed volume the poynting vector tells us that no storage or dissipation of energy is taking place, ie it tells us nothing and is therefore of no use in this situation. In non-static fields it does mean something, but even here it may not completely describe the energy flow. The Poynting Vector is just one of an infinite number of way of describing energy flow. It is a convenient and mathematically simple one, but not a complete solution. For instance an alternative one is the Slepian Vector which is mathematically more cumbersome but does include the static case. 73 Jeff |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
| Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
| Outside Antenna | Shortwave | |||
| WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||