| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Larry Gauthier \(K8UT\)" wrote in message ...
I just completed the installation and tuning of a multiband inverted vee for 160, 80, and 75 meters. Essentially, the antenna consists of a center PVC insulator with 6 terminal posts (2 per band) and the three dipoles separated by wooden dowel-rod spreaders at spacings of about 6 inches. All three sets of wires are direct fed with one RG/8u. I have adjusted the lengths of each antenna to move the resonant point to preferred frequencies for each band: 1.825 on 160, 3.525 on 80, and 3.775 on 75. However, at resonance the SWR on all antennas remains relatively high -- an MFJ259 analyzer says resonant SWRs are around 1.7-2.0:1 and characteristic impedances are 100 ohms or slightly higher. Is a 2:1 balun the solution, and which balun method? Seems to me I have the following choices: 1. A "balun kit" from someone like thewireman.com and build my own. This could be in either the form of a voltage or a current type -- which type would be best? I guess that could work... 2. A coax balun in the form of a 1/4 wavelength of RGB/11u 75 ohm coax -- replacing a portion of the RG/8u feedline with RG/11u. But since I am using this for two bands... what length would offer the best compromise for both 80 and 160? I guess this could also, but I'm not sure about the best length as a compromise. You shouldn't really need one on the lowest band, unless it's coupling to something else. 3. A coiled-coax balun which I have seen described as "about 16 turns of RG8x on 3 inch PVC stock". This is 1:1. No transformation, so would only help decouple the feedline. All of these options are easily do-able, but which looks like the best route? Your opinions are welcome. The best route would be to separate the dipoles enough to avoid the coupling you are seeing between them. That way, you wouldn't need to do anything else. I always space paralleled dipoles as far apart as possible. With your bands, I'd run the two set of 80 legs at right angles, as a turnstile. "I run this myself". Then the 160 legs somewhere in between. You should only see coupling effects on the higher bands. Usually not the lowest band. If you see effects on the lowest band, it's probably coupling to something else in the area. "power lines, guy wires, etc"..If it were me, and I couldn't space the legs out, I'd probably prefer the coax transformer as a first shot. I'd probably try a 1/4 wave section for 80m, "appx 44 ft or so for 75 ohm .66VF coax" and see if I could match 160 as is by varying the lengths or spacing. If that didn't work, I guess you could try a 2:1 balun. MK |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Balun on various bands | Antenna | |||
| Advice wanted:T-match Coax Balun for Yagi Beam | Antenna | |||
| Horizontal loop - balun or no balun ? | Antenna | |||
| Balun Grounding Question ? | Antenna | |||
| BALUN ?? | Antenna | |||