LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2   Report Post  
Old January 30th 04, 08:46 PM
Mark Keith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Larry Gauthier \(K8UT\)" wrote in message ...
I just completed the installation and tuning of a multiband inverted vee for
160, 80, and 75 meters. Essentially, the antenna consists of a center PVC
insulator with 6 terminal posts (2 per band) and the three dipoles separated
by wooden dowel-rod spreaders at spacings of about 6 inches. All three sets
of wires are direct fed with one RG/8u.

I have adjusted the lengths of each antenna to move the resonant point to
preferred frequencies for each band: 1.825 on 160, 3.525 on 80, and 3.775 on
75. However, at resonance the SWR on all antennas remains relatively high --
an MFJ259 analyzer says resonant SWRs are around 1.7-2.0:1 and
characteristic impedances are 100 ohms or slightly higher. Is a 2:1 balun
the solution, and which balun method? Seems to me I have the following
choices:

1. A "balun kit" from someone like thewireman.com and build my own. This
could be in either the form of a voltage or a current type -- which type
would be best?


I guess that could work...

2. A coax balun in the form of a 1/4 wavelength of RGB/11u 75 ohm coax --
replacing a portion of the RG/8u feedline with RG/11u. But since I am using
this for two bands... what length would offer the best compromise for both
80 and 160?


I guess this could also, but I'm not sure about the best length as a
compromise.
You shouldn't really need one on the lowest band, unless it's coupling
to something else.

3. A coiled-coax balun which I have seen described as "about 16 turns of
RG8x on 3 inch PVC stock".


This is 1:1. No transformation, so would only help decouple the
feedline.

All of these options are easily do-able, but which looks like the best
route? Your opinions are welcome.


The best route would be to separate the dipoles enough to avoid the
coupling you are seeing between them. That way, you wouldn't need to
do anything else. I always space paralleled dipoles as far apart as
possible. With your bands, I'd run the two set of 80 legs at right
angles, as a turnstile. "I run this myself".
Then the 160 legs somewhere in between. You should only see coupling
effects on the higher bands. Usually not the lowest band. If you see
effects on the lowest band, it's probably coupling to something else
in the area. "power lines, guy wires, etc"..If it were me, and I
couldn't space the legs out, I'd probably prefer the coax transformer
as a first shot. I'd probably try a 1/4 wave section for 80m, "appx 44
ft or so for 75 ohm .66VF coax" and see if I could match 160 as is by
varying the lengths or spacing. If that didn't work, I guess you could
try a 2:1 balun. MK
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Balun on various bands Frank MacKenzie-Lamb Antenna 4 January 29th 04 01:16 AM
Advice wanted:T-match Coax Balun for Yagi Beam Steve B. Antenna 7 January 7th 04 04:30 AM
Horizontal loop - balun or no balun ? Per Enocson Antenna 5 December 14th 03 02:28 AM
Balun Grounding Question ? Robert11 Antenna 6 November 23rd 03 10:39 PM
BALUN ?? Johnny V. Mullins Antenna 9 November 10th 03 07:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017