Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 Mar 2007 11:10:45 -0800, "art" wrote:
basically nothing Hi Art, If you cannot explain why your work fails at the bench, I'm afraid you are not going to find anyone to read theories with equal flaws. Let's look at another difficult question: You write at your web page that you have 3 elements with coordinates: #1 -1.8421 3.0697 83.6493 -25.311 25.3112 82.7236 #2 -1.7146 7.636 79.6994 -15.45145 37.578 79.6994 #3 4.3792 2.528931 81.4985 3.9279 23.645 83.6096 You (not anyone else) show two of these as being orthogonal to the X axis. A simple review of the numbers does not requi 1. A text book; 2. NEC; 3. A computer; 4. A new theory to show that none of them are. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NEC computor programs | Antenna | |||
Gaussian antenna aunwin | Antenna | |||
A gaussian style radiating antenna | Antenna | |||
Has anyone ever designed a SW transmission system using curtan arrays that has a beamwidth of 2.5 to 5 degrees? | Shortwave | |||
Antenna computor modeling analysis | Antenna |