Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 12, 8:51 am, "art" wrote:
On 11 Mar, 18:45, Cecil Moore wrote: Richard Clark wrote: Determining the *frequency*? That has to be the most obscure contribution I've ever seen. Richard, do you understand that free electrons can emit photons of any frequency? i.e. no orbital change necessary? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Cecil, you should look up the background of JOHN E DAVIS from MIT that the group just dissed. He is not just a nobody, he has credentials that should be respected Art |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So we have this group lining up with space Antenna engineering on the
West Coast against M.I.T. space engineering on the East Coast. The Patent Office may have to invite the IEEE to adjudicate on Art's patent or else dig up Gauss's grave. Looks like this could run a bit longer yet. Derek |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Mar, 17:45, "Derek" wrote:
So we have this group lining up with space Antenna engineering on the West Coast against M.I.T. space engineering on the East Coast. The Patent Office may have to invite the IEEE to adjudicate on Art's patent or else dig up Gauss's grave. Looks like this could run a bit longer yet. Derek NO,NO,NO. Let us have Fox news on one side with the CB's and NASA (don't stigmatize ham radio) and CNN with MIT on the other side. NASA starts of with Maxwells theme and MIT east coast comes back with Maxwell has nothing to do with it it was Gauss that started the logic based on equilibrium and Maxwell didn't evolve anything about equilibrium. Of course IEEE could still be the science adjudicator only. Then NASA could come back with La Place and then we go to a commercial followed by a rebuttal from the CB ers who will then interject photons. Heh T.V. or public radio would have a lot of fun doing the background with segments on Green Gauss, Heaviside, Newton e.t.c. to give the debate more flavor tho the verbalising is going to get so fierce that the West coast NASA and the CB ers may demand that Maxwell be dug up to talk on his own behalf and offcourse MIT will make similar demands for Gauss so both Gauss and Maxwell can apply for a visa beforehand. As for the USPTO they have got the money so the outcome of the patent rerquest doesn't really matter! People with colds must not be allowed in as both Gauss and Maxwell won't want to hear anything to do with coffin!! Maybe U tube would be a better stage to air the subject so the public can see a punch up!!!!! Somebody alert 60 minuits Art |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Mar, 18:16, "art" wrote:
On 12 Mar, 17:45, "Derek" wrote: So we have this group lining up with space Antenna engineering on the West Coast against M.I.T. space engineering on the East Coast. The Patent Office may have to invite the IEEE to adjudicate on Art's patent or else dig up Gauss's grave. Looks like this could run a bit longer yet. Derek NO,NO,NO. Let us have Fox news on one side with the CB's and NASA (don't stigmatize ham radio) and CNN with MIT on the other side. NASA starts of with Maxwells theme and MIT east coast comes back with Maxwell has nothing to do with it it was Gauss that started the logic based on equilibrium and Maxwell didn't evolve anything about equilibrium. Of course IEEE could still be the science adjudicator only. Then NASA could come back with La Place and then we go to a commercial followed by a rebuttal from the CB ers who will then interject photons. Heh T.V. or public radio would have a lot of fun doing the background with segments on Green Gauss, Heaviside, Newton e.t.c. to give the debate more flavor tho the verbalising is going to get so fierce that the West coast NASA and the CB ers may demand that Maxwell be dug up to talk on his own behalf and offcourse MIT will make similar demands for Gauss so both Gauss and Maxwell can apply for a visa beforehand. As for the USPTO they have got the money so the outcome of the patent rerquest doesn't really matter! People with colds must not be allowed in as both Gauss and Maxwell won't want to hear anything to do with coffin!! Maybe U tube would be a better stage to air the subject so the public can see a punch up!!!!! Somebody alert 60 minuits Art Re MIT vs Nasa and the CBersc Oh forgot to mention, astronaut diapers will be made available for hams ooooops no, CB ers incase things go against them Art |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now thats more like it..
Who's next? D |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gaussian antenna aunwin | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian law and time varying fields | Antenna | |||
A gaussian style radiating antenna | Antenna | |||
FA: ELGENCO 602A GAUSSIAN NOISE GENERATOR- Weird! @$10 | Equipment |