"Derek" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Mar 13, 6:33 pm, Richard Clark wrote:
On 13 Mar 2007 22:15:37 GMT, (John E. Davis)
wrote:

I do not understand your comment.

Hi John,

It was rather explicit. To have disputed Dave's assertion with
additional material that substantiated him, makes for a rather strange
reading of Feynman.

. You can bow out once again,
of course, and become a martyr instead. Or you can indulge us with a
dialog with Art.


I would think this comment applied equally to Dave.


Derek

i like the post that points out the unnecessary t in the Gauss's law
equation... well done. sri i didn't state that myself, but i have had
better things to do than try to argue with art.