Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Apr 2007 12:48:58 -0700, art wrote:
It was only AFTER the intervention did you aknoweledged the undeniable truth of what Dr Davis presented. Hi Art, Well, in fact it was Dr. Davis (who came into the discussion rather late) who had to agree in the end with those who presented the simple connection between Maxwell (actually Heaviside) with his time variant magnetic fields and Gauss with his time invariant magnetic fields. Every antenna modeler on the market employs the time variant magnetic fields' math described by Maxwell (actually Heaviside). Maxwell is about dynamics, which means time variant; and Gauss is about statics, which means time invariant (or constant, never changing). If you inject a "cessation of time" you are already in the dynamics side of magnetics = Maxwell. Are you declining the invitation to review Feynman? He is pretty accessible, not much math - except for what really counts. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gaussian antenna aunwin | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian law and time varying fields | Antenna | |||
A gaussian style radiating antenna | Antenna | |||
FA: ELGENCO 602A GAUSSIAN NOISE GENERATOR- Weird! @$10 | Equipment |