On 19 Apr, 15:21, Richard Clark wrote:
On 19 Apr 2007 12:48:58 -0700, art wrote:

It was only AFTER the intervention did you aknoweledged the undeniable
truth of what
Dr Davis presented.

Hi Art,

Well, in fact it was Dr. Davis (who came into the discussion rather
late) who had to agree in the end with those who presented the simple
connection between Maxwell (actually Heaviside) with his time variant
magnetic fields and Gauss with his time invariant magnetic fields.
Every antenna modeler on the market employs the time variant magnetic
fields' math described by Maxwell (actually Heaviside).

Maxwell is about dynamics, which means time variant; and Gauss is
about statics, which means time invariant (or constant, never
changing). If you inject a "cessation of time" you are already in the
dynamics side of magnetics = Maxwell.

Are you declining the invitation to review Feynman? He is pretty
accessible, not much math - except for what really counts.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

You are lying again. You never convinced the Doctor in any sort of
corrective way, only one person stated agreement with his summation of
mathematics No body in this group has brought forward prior knowledge
or agreement between conservative and not conservative fields by use
of the Gaussian method. Oh how quickly people forget their anger of
the idea of connecting static with non static situations. My goodness
how soon you forget the slander projected because of this supposedly
silly idea. As far as going with you to review Feynman forget it. If
you can find proof of anything relevent fine it would give a good
starting point as to why antenna engineers declined to pursue the
discovery. Frankly I am getting close to the position that most do not
understand antennas, what I am proposing and just want to prove their
masculinity by way of slander, this ofcourse does not apply to you.
I believe this thread will make a wonderfull story in the future as to
how rank amateurs tried to stop science from advancing. The material
is here both funny and sad which will come into focus when the patent
is awarded and interest picks up. True I have provoked people to
verbalise their thoughts but for good reason I want to show all what
you really are in the near future.Sooner or later this all will be
discussed in all educational institutions and the next generation can
move forward without hindrence from the agrivation of a bunch of old
men.