Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Apr, 19:41, Richard Clark wrote:
On 19 Apr 2007 16:26:33 -0700, art wrote: As far as going with you to review Feynman forget it. If you can find proof of anything relevent fine it would give a good starting point as to why antenna engineers declined to pursue the discovery. Hi Art, Feynman merely confirmed the math of 70 years of antenna design before him. Nothing has altered since 1963, dynamic magnetic fields are still defined by Maxwell's (Heaviside's) equations, and static magnetic fields are still defined by Gauss' equations. Any discussion of the "cessation of time" immediately casts all work into Maxwell's (Heaviside's) math. Nothing had to be invented because Maxwell (Heaviside) had done the basic math long before antennas were ever discovered. In fact, about 190 years ago Augustin-Jean Fresnel beat them all to the punch without a flicker of electricity or magnetism ever entering the picture. Antenna engineers have been using Fresnel math too. Amateur radio operators respond to it every time they complain of picket-fencing on 2M. That math is contained in EVERY antenna modeler that offers radiation characteristics. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gaussian antenna aunwin | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian law and time varying fields | Antenna | |||
A gaussian style radiating antenna | Antenna | |||
FA: ELGENCO 602A GAUSSIAN NOISE GENERATOR- Weird! @$10 | Equipment |