Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
Are the principles that apply to this example inconsistent with the general case (eg dc, ac, transient, steady state etc)? Of course, pure DC principles are not adequate to cover general case distributed network problems. Else, there would have been no need to develop the distributed network model. How would your transmission line calculator work if you only used DC principles? For instance, the conditions at the source are opposite between the RF frequency where the feedline length is 1/4WL and the RF frequency where the same feedline length is 1/2WL. Conditions are also opposite depending upon whether a Thevenin equivalent or a Norton equivalent is chosen. Ramo and Whinnery, of "Fields and Waves ..." fame, warn us not to attach any significance to the dissipation within those two equivalent circuits. They are still equivalent even though one is dissipating zero watts and the other is dissipating 200 watts. Even when the impedance is the same between the DC problem and the 1/2WL RF problem, the DC current in the middle of the feedline is zero while the RF current in the middle of the 1/2WL section is at a maximum. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yo answers | Shortwave | |||
Question pools and answers... | Policy | |||
K1MAN - Answers Please? | Policy | |||
Answers to Radio Puzzlers No. 3 thru 7 | Shortwave | |||
Three short answers | Antenna |