Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
Dan Bloomquist wrote in news:xYhKh.5014$ya1.2122 @news02.roc.ny: But your underlying principle is that the source steps and doesn't change. So any general case where the source is at some different level is now not covered. It semantics Dan, the excitation is part of the scenario or example, it is not a principle of circuits or transmisssion lines. Like saying the impedance of a capacitor is the same no matter what the frequency...... From here, I'll let you have the last word. I'm not into hand waving.... Owen Best, Dan. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yo answers | Shortwave | |||
Question pools and answers... | Policy | |||
K1MAN - Answers Please? | Policy | |||
Answers to Radio Puzzlers No. 3 thru 7 | Shortwave | |||
Three short answers | Antenna |