Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 29th 07, 11:48 PM posted to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 202
Default VSWR doesn't matter? But how about "mismatch loss"?

billcalley wrote:
On Mar 29, 1:34 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
billcalley wrote:
Since mismatch loss is the "amount of power lost due to
reflection", and is as if an "attenuator with a value of the mismatch
loss where placed in series with the transmission line", then I would
think that VSWR would *definitely* matter, and not just for highly
lossy lines either. But here again, I'm probably not seeing the
entire picture here. What am I missing??

If the system is Z0-matched, e.g. antenna tuner, there is
a mismatch gain at the tuner that offsets the mismatch
loss at the load so, in a lossless system, nothing is
lost. Wave cancellation toward the source is balanced
by constructive interference toward the load.
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com


Now my head *really* hurts! This is a VERY confusing subject, to
say the least. (And I also thought antenna tuners actually had a
*loss* due to their limited Q...I think I'm going to change careers
now and just become a pet groomer; or perhaps simply give up
completely and work at Radio Shack).

If you start considering loss in the tuner and the line then yes, a
greater mismatch between the antenna and the line will result in more
lost power (and more component heating in the tuner). You really want
to leave that subject be until you understand the properties of a
lossless system.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/

Do you need to implement control loops in software?
"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" gives you just what it says.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
  #12   Report Post  
Old March 29th 07, 11:53 PM posted to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 234
Default VSWR doesn't matter? But how about "mismatch loss"?

"billcalley" wrote in
oups.com:

What I gleaned from the excellent answers for the original "VSWR
Doesn't Matter?" thread is that high VSWR doesn't really matter in a
lossless transmission line environment between a transmitter's antenna
tuner and the antenna, since any reflected RF energy will simply
continue to "bounce" back and forth between the tuner's output
impedance and the antenna's input impedance until it is, finally,
completely radiated from the antenna without loss.


Well, there will be tuner losses, depending on how good the tuner's
components are.

But then why does the concept of "mismatch loss" exist in
reference to antennas? I have quickly calculated that if a
transmitter outputs 100 watts, and the TX antenna has an impedance
that will cause a VSWR of 10:1 -- using lossless transmission line --
that the mismatch loss in this "lossless" system would be 4.81dB!
(Reflected power 66.9 watts, RL -1.74).


Since mismatch loss is the "amount of power lost due to
reflection", and is as if an "attenuator with a value of the mismatch
loss where placed in series with the transmission line", then I would
think that VSWR would *definitely* matter, and not just for highly
lossy lines either. But here again, I'm probably not seeing the
entire picture here. What am I missing??

Confused!



Yes, you're confused.

If the lossless transmission line (obviously no such animal exists) were
tuned with a lossless tuner, then VSWR would not matter at all.

The loss due to mismatch in any real system will depend upon frequency,
VSWR, type of feedline, length of feedline, and the quality of the tuning
circuits used to match the system to the transmitter.

Let's take your example. 100 watt transmitter into, let's say 100ft. of
feedline at 10:1 VSWR and assume tuner losses are negligble (they often
aren't). Here are the losses for some different kinds of 50 ohm coax at
10mhz:

Belden 8237 2.19db
Belden 9913 1.63db
Belden 9258 3.19db
Belden 8240 3.71db
Belden 9201 3.83db

So, what's obvious here is that different coaxes have different losses at
high SWR. Why is that? Because as power is reflected back and forth in
a transmission line, the losses accumulate. So line that is very low-
loss to begin with will be less affected by high SWR than line that has
moderate to high losses when flat.

If 10 percent of the power in a line is lost travelling from the
transmitter to the antenna, and if the antenna only radiates half that
power, sending the rest back down the line, then 45 percent of the
transmitter power is radiated immediately, while 45 percent is reflected.
But only 40.5 percent reaches the tuner or transmitter. If ALL of that
is re-reflected, then only 36.45 percent of the power is available at the
second reflection to the antenna. The antenna will radiate 18.225
percent of the transmitter's power at this point, making the total 63.225
percent of the transmitter's output. Another 18.225 percent will be
reflected again and, of that 16.4025 percent of the transmit power will
live to be re-reflected from the tuner and 14.76225 percent will arrive
at the antenna on the next bounce. Of that we can expect 7.381125
percent of the transmitter's total power to end up radiated while an
equal amount starts its way back to the tuner. Anyway, it becomes a
pretty simple bit of limit math to predict exactly how much will be
radiated and how much lost in the coax under these conditions.



--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
  #13   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 12:42 AM posted to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default VSWR doesn't matter? But how about "mismatch loss"?

On 29 Mar 2007 13:10:46 -0700, "billcalley"
wrote:

What I gleaned from the excellent answers for the original "VSWR
Doesn't Matter?" thread is that high VSWR doesn't really matter in a
lossless transmission line environment between a transmitter's antenna
tuner and the antenna, since any reflected RF energy will simply
continue to "bounce" back and forth between the tuner's output
impedance and the antenna's input impedance until it is, finally,
completely radiated from the antenna without loss.


Hi Bill,

As a short description, that is adequate.

But then why does the concept of "mismatch loss" exist in
reference to antennas?


"Mismatch loss" is a system description, not an antenna description.
So your reference is wrong.

I have quickly calculated that if a
transmitter outputs 100 watts, and the TX antenna has an impedance
that will cause a VSWR of 10:1 -- using lossless transmission line --
that the mismatch loss in this "lossless" system would be 4.81dB!
(Reflected power 66.9 watts, RL -1.74).


Two things wrong he
1. You say nothing of a tuner inline;
B. Your math is wrong either way.

Since mismatch loss is the "amount of power lost due to
reflection", and is as if an "attenuator with a value of the mismatch
loss where placed in series with the transmission line", then I would
think that VSWR would *definitely* matter, and not just for highly
lossy lines either.


It does matter if you lack a tuner (in more ways that one). Most
discussion of "mismatch loss" omits such matters as tuners as it is a
separable issue. Combining these topics raises your chance of
confusion.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #14   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 01:00 AM posted to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Default VSWR doesn't matter? But how about "mismatch loss"?

billcalley wrote:
What I gleaned from the excellent answers for the original "VSWR
Doesn't Matter?" thread is that high VSWR doesn't really matter in a
lossless transmission line environment between a transmitter's antenna
tuner and the antenna, since any reflected RF energy will simply
continue to "bounce" back and forth between the tuner's output
impedance and the antenna's input impedance until it is, finally,
completely radiated from the antenna without loss.

But then why does the concept of "mismatch loss" exist in
reference to antennas? I have quickly calculated that if a
transmitter outputs 100 watts, and the TX antenna has an impedance
that will cause a VSWR of 10:1 -- using lossless transmission line --
that the mismatch loss in this "lossless" system would be 4.81dB!
(Reflected power 66.9 watts, RL -1.74).

Since mismatch loss is the "amount of power lost due to
reflection", and is as if an "attenuator with a value of the mismatch
loss where placed in series with the transmission line", then I would
think that VSWR would *definitely* matter, and not just for highly
lossy lines either. But here again, I'm probably not seeing the
entire picture here. What am I missing??

Confused!

-Bill


I think the confusion (which *always* seems to arise)
comes from the mix of the concept with the real world.
The concept claims that the system is lossless, so the
power bounces around until it eventually exits the "system"
via the antenna. Real world, the system is lossy, so
with all the bouncing around some of the power fails to
leave the system via RF radiation and instead leaves
the system via IR radiation. More heat, less RF.
Tastes great, less filling. :-)

Ed
  #15   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 01:30 AM posted to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 58
Default VSWR doesn't matter? But how about "mismatch loss"?

Tim Wescott wrote:

billcalley wrote:

What I gleaned from the excellent answers for the original "VSWR
Doesn't Matter?" thread is that high VSWR doesn't really matter in a
lossless transmission line environment between a transmitter's antenna
tuner and the antenna, since any reflected RF energy will simply
continue to "bounce" back and forth between the tuner's output
impedance and the antenna's input impedance until it is, finally,
completely radiated from the antenna without loss.

But then why does the concept of "mismatch loss" exist in
reference to antennas? I have quickly calculated that if a
transmitter outputs 100 watts, and the TX antenna has an impedance
that will cause a VSWR of 10:1 -- using lossless transmission line --
that the mismatch loss in this "lossless" system would be 4.81dB!
(Reflected power 66.9 watts, RL -1.74).

Since mismatch loss is the "amount of power lost due to
reflection", and is as if an "attenuator with a value of the mismatch
loss where placed in series with the transmission line", then I would
think that VSWR would *definitely* matter, and not just for highly
lossy lines either. But here again, I'm probably not seeing the
entire picture here. What am I missing??

Your "amount of power lost due to reflection" statement would be true if
the line were connected to something resistive at the line's
characteristic impedance. With a properly tuned tuner, that's not the
case -- instead, the impedance looking into the tuner will also reflect
power, and in a way that makes it all work out so that the power all
ends up being radiated, which is what you wanted in the first place.


Unless your coax decides that it had enough of all this current. I had
that happen once. The SWR had gone up and I pressed on. Then a muffled
boom outside and it became 100% reflective. Now I had to get on a ladder
and painstakingly scrape all the molten gunk off the stucco.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com


  #16   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 02:15 AM posted to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 48
Default VSWR doesn't matter? But how about "mismatch loss"?

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:10:46 -0700, billcalley wrote:

What I gleaned from the excellent answers for the original "VSWR
Doesn't Matter?" thread is that high VSWR doesn't really matter in a
lossless transmission line environment between a transmitter's antenna
tuner and the antenna, since any reflected RF energy will simply
continue to "bounce" back and forth between the tuner's output
impedance and the antenna's input impedance until it is, finally,
completely radiated from the antenna without loss.

But then why does the concept of "mismatch loss" exist in
reference to antennas? I have quickly calculated that if a
transmitter outputs 100 watts, and the TX antenna has an impedance
that will cause a VSWR of 10:1 -- using lossless transmission line --
that the mismatch loss in this "lossless" system would be 4.81dB!
(Reflected power 66.9 watts, RL -1.74).

Since mismatch loss is the "amount of power lost due to
reflection", and is as if an "attenuator with a value of the mismatch
loss where placed in series with the transmission line", then I would
think that VSWR would *definitely* matter, and not just for highly
lossy lines either. But here again, I'm probably not seeing the
entire picture here. What am I missing??

Confused!


It truly wouldn't matter if there were no such thing as resistance
and so on. The whole circuit could be tuned, with the transmission line
a part of it, and all of the power would go out the antenna.

Unfortunately, that's not the way reality works, more's the pity.

Every time those "standing waves" bounce back and forth, they warm
up the transmission line, the connectors, the transmitter tank, the
transmitter itself, etc, etc, and Entropy is conserved. ;-)

Hope This Helps!
Rich


  #17   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 02:31 AM posted to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default VSWR doesn't matter? But how about "mismatch loss"?

On 29 Mar 2007 13:10:46 -0700, "billcalley"
wrote:
I have quickly calculated that if a
transmitter outputs 100 watts, and the TX antenna has an impedance
that will cause a VSWR of 10:1 -- using lossless transmission line --
that the mismatch loss in this "lossless" system would be 4.81dB!
(Reflected power 66.9 watts, RL -1.74).


Taking this at face value, yes, the "mismatch loss" is 4.8dB.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #18   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 02:52 AM posted to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
bw bw is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 27
Default VSWR doesn't matter? But how about "mismatch loss"?

On Mar 29, 8:15 pm, Rich Grise wrote:
Every time those "standing waves" bounce back and forth, they warm
up the transmission line, the connectors, the transmitter tank, the
transmitter itself, etc, etc, and Entropy is conserved. ;-)


Humor noted, but Entropy is not conserved.

Entropy increases


  #19   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 03:34 AM posted to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 118
Default 18:1 all band dipole?

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:44:24 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

No tuner! I don't like tuner losses. The feedpoint impedance
is always between 35 ohms and 85 ohms resistive. My choke
has an impedance in the thousands of ohms.


Cecil,

Please explain your antenna and radio. I am assuming you have a solid
state rig with an so-239 connector on it for the basic and then you do
what?

Thanks


--
73 for now
Buck, N4PGW
www.lumpuckeroo.com
  #20   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 03:36 AM posted to sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default VSWR doesn't matter? But how about "mismatch loss"?

bw wrote:
Entropy increases


Seems to me that evolution violates that principle.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SolderSmoke #43: LP Filters, Titan, Feedback amps, Return Loss Bridges, "Gonzo Gizmos" [email protected] Boatanchors 2 December 13th 06 06:42 PM
SolderSmoke #43: LP Filters, Titan, Feedback amps, Return Loss Bridges, "Gonzo Gizmos" [email protected] Equipment 2 December 13th 06 06:42 PM
SolderSmoke #43: LP Filters, Titan, Feedback amps, Return Loss Bridges, "Gonzo Gizmos" [email protected] Homebrew 3 December 13th 06 06:42 PM
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? K4YZ Policy 6 August 28th 06 11:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017