Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
billcalley wrote:
On Mar 29, 1:34 pm, Cecil Moore wrote: billcalley wrote: Since mismatch loss is the "amount of power lost due to reflection", and is as if an "attenuator with a value of the mismatch loss where placed in series with the transmission line", then I would think that VSWR would *definitely* matter, and not just for highly lossy lines either. But here again, I'm probably not seeing the entire picture here. What am I missing?? If the system is Z0-matched, e.g. antenna tuner, there is a mismatch gain at the tuner that offsets the mismatch loss at the load so, in a lossless system, nothing is lost. Wave cancellation toward the source is balanced by constructive interference toward the load. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com Now my head *really* hurts! This is a VERY confusing subject, to say the least. (And I also thought antenna tuners actually had a *loss* due to their limited Q...I think I'm going to change careers now and just become a pet groomer; or perhaps simply give up completely and work at Radio Shack). If you start considering loss in the tuner and the line then yes, a greater mismatch between the antenna and the line will result in more lost power (and more component heating in the tuner). You really want to leave that subject be until you understand the properties of a lossless system. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ Do you need to implement control loops in software? "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" gives you just what it says. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|