Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"billcalley" wrote in
oups.com: What I gleaned from the excellent answers for the original "VSWR Doesn't Matter?" thread is that high VSWR doesn't really matter in a lossless transmission line environment between a transmitter's antenna tuner and the antenna, since any reflected RF energy will simply continue to "bounce" back and forth between the tuner's output impedance and the antenna's input impedance until it is, finally, completely radiated from the antenna without loss. Well, there will be tuner losses, depending on how good the tuner's components are. But then why does the concept of "mismatch loss" exist in reference to antennas? I have quickly calculated that if a transmitter outputs 100 watts, and the TX antenna has an impedance that will cause a VSWR of 10:1 -- using lossless transmission line -- that the mismatch loss in this "lossless" system would be 4.81dB! (Reflected power 66.9 watts, RL -1.74). Since mismatch loss is the "amount of power lost due to reflection", and is as if an "attenuator with a value of the mismatch loss where placed in series with the transmission line", then I would think that VSWR would *definitely* matter, and not just for highly lossy lines either. But here again, I'm probably not seeing the entire picture here. What am I missing?? Confused! Yes, you're confused. If the lossless transmission line (obviously no such animal exists) were tuned with a lossless tuner, then VSWR would not matter at all. The loss due to mismatch in any real system will depend upon frequency, VSWR, type of feedline, length of feedline, and the quality of the tuning circuits used to match the system to the transmitter. Let's take your example. 100 watt transmitter into, let's say 100ft. of feedline at 10:1 VSWR and assume tuner losses are negligble (they often aren't). Here are the losses for some different kinds of 50 ohm coax at 10mhz: Belden 8237 2.19db Belden 9913 1.63db Belden 9258 3.19db Belden 8240 3.71db Belden 9201 3.83db So, what's obvious here is that different coaxes have different losses at high SWR. Why is that? Because as power is reflected back and forth in a transmission line, the losses accumulate. So line that is very low- loss to begin with will be less affected by high SWR than line that has moderate to high losses when flat. If 10 percent of the power in a line is lost travelling from the transmitter to the antenna, and if the antenna only radiates half that power, sending the rest back down the line, then 45 percent of the transmitter power is radiated immediately, while 45 percent is reflected. But only 40.5 percent reaches the tuner or transmitter. If ALL of that is re-reflected, then only 36.45 percent of the power is available at the second reflection to the antenna. The antenna will radiate 18.225 percent of the transmitter's power at this point, making the total 63.225 percent of the transmitter's output. Another 18.225 percent will be reflected again and, of that 16.4025 percent of the transmit power will live to be re-reflected from the tuner and 14.76225 percent will arrive at the antenna on the next bounce. Of that we can expect 7.381125 percent of the transmitter's total power to end up radiated while an equal amount starts its way back to the tuner. Anyway, it becomes a pretty simple bit of limit math to predict exactly how much will be radiated and how much lost in the coax under these conditions. -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 1800667 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|