Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Fuller wrote:
Even if you could separate the forward and reverse waves the Poynting vector energy calculation would still come out to exactly zero for each component as well as the sum of the components. Forward and reflected waves are easily separated by a circulator so their existence is difficult to deny. So net energy equals zero? So what! We are NOT discussing net energy here. We are discussing the forward Poynting vector and the reflected Poynting vector as described in "Fields and Waves ...", by Ramo and Whinnery. The Superpositon Principle gives us permission to do so and the final result is identical to any other valid analysis. Why are you guys so irrationally afraid of the wave reflection model? What is your ulterior motive in denying the existence of reflected waves during steady-state? It has seemingly turned into a steady-state religion administered by the steady-state high priests. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
R100 Checksum Invalid | Equipment | |||
ANC-4 principle? | Homebrew | |||
EZNEC and Invalid Use of Null | Antenna |