Keith Dysart wrote:
Well that is a great leap forward. Since that was the point
of my response to your first post, I am curious as to why
you chose to object.

Exactly what is it that I objected to?

Do you now agree?

Old, worn out, diversionary technique. Doesn't work.
If you can prove that I ever said power can be
superposed, I will send you a $100 bill.

Have you stopped beating your girlfriend? See,
I know how to do that also.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

"Cecil Moore" wrote

Old, worn out, diversionary technique. Doesn't work.
If you can prove that I ever said power can be
superposed, I will send you a $100 bill.

Have you stopped beating your girlfriend? See,
I know how to do that also.
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

What do you know how to do, Cecil? Stop beating
your girlfriend? (big grin)

Mike w5chr

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:59:54 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

If you can prove that I ever said power can be
superposed, I will send you a $100 bill.

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 01:20:35 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Ptotal = P1 + P2 + 2*SQRT(P1*P2)cos(A)

Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

If you can prove that I ever said power can be
superposed, I will send you a $100 bill.

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 01:20:35 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Ptotal = P1 + P2 + 2*SQRT(P1*P2)cos(A)

Sorry Richard, that is not superposition. That is the
way the power is calculated when two EM waves are
superposed. And no, Eugene Hecht did not superpose
irradiances. For being wrong, please send me a
$100 bill. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:13:27 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

that is not superposition. That is the
way the power is calculated when two EM waves are
superposed.

Texans....

Did Karl Rove write that flip-flop for you?

Richard Clark wrote:
Did Karl Rove write that flip-flop for you?

I'm afraid what you inferred is something that
I didn't imply. At no time have I ever said or
implied that scalar values can be superposed.
I have said many times that they cannot be.

Hecht's irradiance equations are valid for
computing transmission line power. As far as
I know, Dr. Best first applied the irradiance
equations to transmission lines in his 2001 QEX
article. Before that, I had never heard of the
irradiance equation.

Those threads with Dr. Best are archived by
Google for the spring/summer of 2001.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:
Did Karl Rove write that flip-flop for you?

I'm afraid what you inferred is something that
I didn't imply. At no time have I ever said or
implied that scalar values can be superposed.
I have said many times that they cannot be.

Hecht's irradiance equations are valid for
computing transmission line power. As far as
I know, Dr. Best first applied the irradiance
equations to transmission lines in his 2001 QEX
article. Before that, I had never heard of the
irradiance equation.

Those threads with Dr. Best are archived by
Google for the spring/summer of 2001.

Cecil,

I think you missed the first publication by a hundred years or more.

73,
Gene
W4SZ

Gene Fuller wrote:
I think you missed the first publication by a hundred years or more.

Could be. Do you have a reference within the field
of RF transmission lines? Dr. Best gives W. Johnson
and Chipman as references but I don't recall seeing
that equation in either book.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com