Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 9:18 am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: Neither of the equations is the "algebraic sum". Of course not, power does not follow the superposition principle. I've reviewed some of your writings and you have said this at least as far back as 2001. This is good. So why did I think otherwise? I think it is your reliance on Ptot = Pfor + Pref. I see this as an expression from superposition much the same as Vtot = Vfor + Vref, but I gather from the paper on your web site that you do not, rather you see it as an expression of conservation of energy. From re-reading your paper, it seems that your thinking all derives from trying to satisfy the principle of conservation of energy. This is good. There is general agreement that energy is conserved. But them I am confused with your ready acceptance of Ptot = P1 + P2 +/- Pinterference Given a P1 that actually exists and a P2 that actually exists it seems to me that Ptot must equal P1 + P2. Anything else would fail to satisfy the principle of conservation of energy. To make the expression work, +/-Pinterference must be creating or destroying energy. Given my understanding of the physical world, this seems most unlikely. Can you elaborate on how +/-Pinterferance creates or destroys energy while still conserving energy? ....Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
R100 Checksum Invalid | Equipment | |||
ANC-4 principle? | Homebrew | |||
EZNEC and Invalid Use of Null | Antenna |