LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2   Report Post  
Old April 4th 07, 09:24 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,169
Default Lightning 'liability' ?

KE5MMJZ wrote in news:slrnf180co.7j9.spam-
:

....
ercted a tower it would probably increase the odds
of lightning striking either it or a nearby object,
and while my house might be protected (or at least
I would be the one choosing to take the risk), what
about the neighbors? Even if the strike would be
directly on my tower, from what I've read there
could be enough induced voltage/current to damage
the 'unprotected' appliances of my neighbors, and
they might blame me for their losses (or even if
it doesn't hit the tower, they may still see it
as the cause of a nearby strike).
Has anyone heard of any such cases or am I
just worrying about the highly improbable?


Frank,

The existence of a tall conductor provides a measure of protection to
nearby structures. The zone is often defined by a "ball" of radius equal
to the height of the tall structure that is rolled on the ground to rest
against the tall structure, and structures between the contact with the
ground and tower, and under the ball are considered protected by the tall
structure, ie that lightning is much more likely to strike the tall
object. In this way, a tower often protects the nearby equipment hut from
direct strikes.

Having said that, there are two other effects you must consider:
- the way in which the discharge current on the tower is dealth with; and
- the fields in the nearby area from the discharge current.

The usual approach is to try to shunt as much of the discharge current to
ground. Nevertheless, some will enter your premises and you should pay
attention to equipotential bonding and single point earthing techniques
to minimise the voltages impressed across equipment interfaces, voltage
that may cause damage.

It is not just about equipment, personal safety is more important, but
provided you use earthing conductors sufficient to survive the lightning
discharges (and people of do not) and equipotential bonding, then
personal protection is fairly easily achieved.

Even if you have dealt with minimising interface voltages in your own
premises, the discharge current may give rise to a surge on the power
lines or metallic water services that couple to your neighbours relative
to each other or telecommunications services. It is conceivable that a
discharge to your tower might not cause damage to your installation but
could damage appliance in neighbouring premises... so I wouldn't call
your tower as protecting neighbours.

Owen
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legal Liability of Moderators [email protected] Policy 6 July 15th 06 06:01 PM
Liability for Purchase - A Question?? hobbes Swap 7 March 1st 05 04:00 AM
eBay's liability limited by court decision W4JLE Swap 1 February 11th 04 06:39 PM
Lightning Man! Len Over 21 Policy 2 October 28th 03 03:41 AM
Lightning? IN/IL Ron Hardin Shortwave 2 July 15th 03 09:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017