LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3   Report Post  
Old April 4th 07, 09:53 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 801
Default Lightning 'liability' ?

Owen Duffy wrote:

Frank,

The existence of a tall conductor provides a measure of protection to
nearby structures. The zone is often defined by a "ball" of radius equal
to the height of the tall structure that is rolled on the ground to rest
against the tall structure, and structures between the contact with the
ground and tower, and under the ball are considered protected by the tall
structure, ie that lightning is much more likely to strike the tall
object. In this way, a tower often protects the nearby equipment hut from
direct strikes.


I believe that the latest research indicates that the "rolling ball"
isn't as accurate as once believed (or necessarily better than the older
"cone of protection"). But the difference might be in the noise floor
for most ham installations.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legal Liability of Moderators [email protected] Policy 6 July 15th 06 06:01 PM
Liability for Purchase - A Question?? hobbes Swap 7 March 1st 05 04:00 AM
eBay's liability limited by court decision W4JLE Swap 1 February 11th 04 06:39 PM
Lightning Man! Len Over 21 Policy 2 October 28th 03 03:41 AM
Lightning? IN/IL Ron Hardin Shortwave 2 July 15th 03 09:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017