Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote in
: This sets me thinking of a way to calculate a lower frequency limit to the loss model when I generate it, so that I can store that limit in the database and prevent calculation below that frequency. I have just analysed the tllc database contents to find cases where the modelled error is more than 10% different to the data points on which the regression was based. There are a few cases, they are all copper clad steel inner conductors (some of the RG6, RG59, RG174, RG316). I need to implement a lower frequency limit for model validity for each cable type. An alternative approach to retain some lower frequency results is to use a cubic spline interpolation... but it has its own problems. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Challenge Solved | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |