| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Owen Duffy wrote:
. . . I understand. One of the cable types that I tried to fit to the loss model was Davis Bury Flex, and it had the worst regression errors of all of the 90 line types that I modelled. . . Ah, yes, that stuff. It's easy to make it fit a model at about 200 MHz and above -- just flex it a bit until the loss matches your model. At 400 MHz, you'll have even more variation to work with. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
| Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
| Reflection Coefficient Challenge Solved | Antenna | |||
| Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
| Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||