Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
K7ITM wrote: No, it's about practicality. Convince me that calculations based primarily on power (or energy) rather than on voltage and current offer me something useful, with respect to TEM lines, and I might have a closer look at them. Assume you are dealing with light waves in free space instead of RF waves in a transmission line. Would you then find intensity (power density) calculations useful? That's why optical physicists find them so useful. Tom, are you familiar with an s-parameter analysis? If so, it seems to me that b1 = s11(a1) + s12(a2) = 0 represent two wave components that immediately cancel to zero when superposed at the impedance discontinuity. Would you care to comment? Cecil, Most serious calculations by optical physicists are done through Maxwell's Equations solvers. Intensity calculations are utterly inadequate for exploring the details of high resolution imaging, for example. 73, Gene W4SZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference | Shortwave | |||
FM Interference when the sun comes up | Broadcasting | |||
Interference | Shortwave |