Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 20, 12:44 am, "Richard" wrote:
One thing: Why are radials so effective? They are not resonant counterpoises, and from the aspect of surface area in contact with ground, radials have hardly any surface area that "connects" with "the earth". I can understand if I put in a 20 foot by 20 foot copper plate flat in the earth that would "connect" to earth quite well, I mean the measured ohmic resistance to "the earth" could be quite low. But also capacitive coupling would be low too. But radials have no real capacitive coupling to "the earth" neither much surface area in contact with "the earth". So it confuses me as to why they are so effective. To put it simply, rather than couple with the earth, they help shield the antenna currents from the lossy earth.. IE: Richard Clarks comment.. "The alternative view of radials is that they operate as a shield against loss." Thats about what it boils down to... In fact, I think 60 radials one inch off the ground should be slightly better than 60 radials touching the ground, both using bare wire. But radials that are elevated to any real height should be resonant for best results. BTW, since it looks like many wires in the earth are as good as a plate, perhaps I could put in a wire mesh grid about 1 foot under the soil over the whole garden . I'm digging up the garden anyway. Perhaps with some ground stakes here and there connected to the grid, although maybe not necessary. Would be ok, but actual radials are a better use of wire, than mesh. Also mesh can develop connection problems on down the line. Mesh has an equal density over it's whole area. But radials place a higher density of wire at the feedpoint, which is what you want. The ground area at the feedpoint is the most critical. But that doesn't mean you want to ignore the area a bit farther out. Normal radials spoked out from a center give you a good appx overall density of wire in the areas you want to have it. In general, for a given amount of wire on the ground, many shorter radials are better than a few long ones. That places more of the wire at the feedpoint. A cylinder or tube, etc makes a lousy rf ground. The lightning ground is the one that needs a super good connection to earth. The RF ground requires *no* connection to earth to function properly. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transforming your simple Ground Rod into a Ground Anchor : Is It Worth The Work ? - You Decide ! | Shortwave | |||
antenna switch, good ground? | General | |||
antenna switch 'ground' how good/valueable?? | Antenna | |||
Antenna ground - how can you tell if it's good | Antenna | |||
How to get a good ground is very rocky terrian??? | Antenna |