Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 19, 4:28 pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
wrote: So would a 80/40/20 be the thing to make? For whats it's worth, I don't have a tuner right now. I just want to cut each for the middle of the band for General phone, and accept whatever bandwidth I get. That'll get you on those three bands and, as I mentioned, you can probably get a reasonable impedance on 15 as well by fiddling the 40 meter antenna a bit. It won't be quite resonant on 40, but probably close enough so your rig won't shut down. Roy Lewallen, W7EL He may notice a resonant point around 27-28-29 mhz also.. If you use a length a coax to feed, that will add a 1/4 wave of length to the 80 legs, IE: about 60-70 feet, you can feed the shorted coax end from the shack, and run it on 160m as a vertical. When I use the 40 legs for 15m, I usually slap a tuner inline as a line flattener to keep the radio happy, and also increase the usable bandwidth. I usually don't trim the 40 antenna to get a match on 15, as I prefer the 40 legs to be tuned where I cut it, which is usually in the middle of the band, so I can work both phone and CW. Any cheap tuner will easily give a good match for 15m, and the loss is going to be low, being the match isn't bad to begin with. In the old days with tube rigs, I never worried about tuning 15. The rigs would tune it no problem, with no tuner required. But the newer solid state radios are a bit pickier.. So I'll put the tuner on. I have a 989c which is always inline, but rarely actually used in most cases, except for the meter, and in rare cases like 15m, 30m, and maybe 160m where I want to tweak the match a bit. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|