| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tdonaly wrote:
That's code. It means "I do not rail against all math models, just the ones that don't agree with me. I require my math models to give the answer I've already made up in my head." No, I require a math model of a coil that agrees with Roy's and Tom's measurements. A lumped inductive reactance doesn't do that. My math models are dictated by reality. Therefore, I live in the real world and you live in a world created and dictated by your math models. I prefer my world. You obviously prefer yours. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? | Antenna | |||