Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 18:33:24 -0600, Mark Keith wrote:
I'm absolutely certain than any error in modeling a short mobile antenna using lumped coils is not worth worrying about. That has been shown several times - unless your skin crawls with differences of 0.5dB This was the main gist of the argument by Yuri. It was the bottom line. He claimed we were modeling in fairly gross error due to this new found revelation of coil current taper. And that pilot's error was addressed before the soap opera began. He promised a new revelation in coil positioning that would turn the mobile antenna world on it's head. Umm yes. The excuse is snow, but given the tapering heat wave reports, the coils should clear that away in half an hour. Patents pending!!! - any further discussion constitutes a violation of Intellectual Property rights subject to suit (40R w/2 pair of pants). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? | Antenna |