Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH:
The scholastics never specified what things meant in terms of real numbers. Cecil says there's a taper but he doesn't attempt to say how much. Yuri thinks it's a lot. Cecil seems to agree with him, but neither fellow has been willing to back his theory with a $$$$ NEW $$$ [{### IMPROVED ###}] mobile antenna. Go to www.K3BU.us and look at the article, measurements and pictures. http://www.k3bu.us/loadingcoils.htm Cecil explained what's happening, shined some light on it and the work is in progress to enlighten the flat earth society. It is not "our theory", it is reality that was described before us by Kraus, ON4UN and others. I used the knowledge to design more efficient mobile antenna for 160. If you understand the current distribution along the loaded antenna, then you can maximize it for better efficiency (roughly proportional to the area under the current curve). Stand by. Yuri, K3BU.us |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? | Antenna |