Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 9, 11:35 am, "no spam" wrote:
I'm looking for plans for a simple AM antenna to connect to my stereo to replace the little loop antenna that came with it. In the past I have used long wires but they are not very directional. I have found some fairly good plans online for what looks like wire wound around a box but all of them seem to have potentiometer in the mix somewhere. It would be very little problem to build an aimable 18 to even 48 inch frame. I only have two AM stations I'd like to come in clearer (690 KHz and 1440 KHz). Would it be possible to make a 'box' with one 'tap' for 690 and one for 1440 then just connect one or the other the radio? How long would be wires need to be and how would I feed it into the connections on the radio (coax)? Like Richard says, it's easier to find an old cap, and build the loop around the cap. The old analog dial stereo receivers have some of the best variables for this purpose. Most are multi gang caps, which often can approach 1000 pf or more if you tie all the gangs together. This can be handy for wide freq use as you can use switches and switch gangs in or out of the circuit to change freq coverage. Most stereo caps also had a few small gangs with low pf values, which are good for extending the coverage higher in frequency. Most old AM radios used dual 365pf caps, which would total 730 pf tied together. This will work ok, but not as switchable as using a several gang cap. The cap on my 44 inch per side loop is 5 gangs total, and I have a switch. You can also "tack" fixed caps in parallel with the variable to drop in frequency. For that matter, once you determined the amount of capacitance for the two frequencies, you could switch between two fixed caps, but who wants to be limited to two freqs? Once you start playing with a good loop, you'll probably want to dial around a bit.. Also, using your present loop as the coupling loop to the bigger loop would be the easiest route. No actual connection is made. You just hold the present small loop within, or closely in front of the bigger loop, and vary distance for max signal. You will notice the sensitivity vary greatly as you move the loop around. Just find the "hot spot" and nail it down... Here is one PVC design I've used.. It's about as simple as I could conjur up, and all parts can be found at any hardware, home depot, etc.. http://web.wt.net/~nm5k/loop5.jpg My big loop is even more simple.. It's just a mast of about 2 inch PVC, and the cross arm is regular 3/4 inch PVC which I drove through a drilled hole on the 2 inch PVC. I drilled wire holes directly in the 2 inch PVC at the top and bottom, and used "T's on the ends of the 3/4 inch PVC. Same as the one in the jpg... It sit's on a stand in the room here, and rotates. If you can't find any old variable caps, they can be bought on the web...Maybe not real cheap, but they can be had. Myself, I butcher them out of old analog dial stereos... BTW, I feed my loops with coax, and have a single wire coupling loop within the bigger main loop, but I built one of the "jpg" loops for a guy on the shortwave group, and he used his antenna in the radio as the coupling loop. He just found the hot spot, and rigged a mount so he could place the radio in that location on a little stand or whatever.. MK |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm looking for plans for a simple AM antenna to connect to my stereo to
replace the little loop antenna that came with it. In the past I have used long wires but they are not very directional. I have found some fairly good plans online for what looks like wire wound around a box but all of them seem to have potentiometer in the mix somewhere. It would be very little problem to build an aimable 18 to even 48 inch frame. I only have two AM stations I'd like to come in clearer (690 KHz and 1440 KHz). Would it be possible to make a 'box' with one 'tap' for 690 and one for 1440 then just connect one or the other the radio? How long would be wires need to be and how would I feed it into the connections on the radio (coax)? Like Richard says, it's easier to find an old cap, and build the loop around the cap. The old analog dial stereo receivers have some of the best variables for this purpose. Most are multi gang caps, which often can approach 1000 pf or more if you tie all the gangs together. This can be handy for wide freq use as you can use switches and switch gangs in or out of the circuit to change freq coverage. Most stereo caps also had a few small gangs with low pf values, good stuff cut) Almost anything is easy if you know how to do it. I was looking for something really simple w/o any electronic parts in it. I posted several URLs with plans for building a loop like the one you are talking about. I naively thought I might just be able to take piece of wire that was a fraction of the wavelength of the freq and wrap it around a frame and aim it in the correct direction. But I didn't want to do all the work only to find out it wouldn't work. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "no spam" wrote in message . net... I'm looking for plans for a simple AM antenna to connect to my stereo to replace the little loop antenna that came with it. In the past I have used long wires but they are not very directional. I have found some fairly good plans online for what looks like wire wound around a box but all of them seem to have potentiometer in the mix somewhere. It would be very little problem to build an aimable 18 to even 48 inch frame. I only have two AM stations I'd like to come in clearer (690 KHz and 1440 KHz). Would it be possible to make a 'box' with one 'tap' for 690 and one for 1440 then just connect one or the other the radio? How long would be wires need to be and how would I feed it into the connections on the radio (coax)? Like Richard says, it's easier to find an old cap, and build the loop around the cap. The old analog dial stereo receivers have some of the best variables for this purpose. Most are multi gang caps, which often can approach 1000 pf or more if you tie all the gangs together. This can be handy for wide freq use as you can use switches and switch gangs in or out of the circuit to change freq coverage. Most stereo caps also had a few small gangs with low pf values, good stuff cut) Almost anything is easy if you know how to do it. I was looking for something really simple w/o any electronic parts in it. I posted several URLs with plans for building a loop like the one you are talking about. I naively thought I might just be able to take piece of wire that was a fraction of the wavelength of the freq and wrap it around a frame and aim it in the correct direction. But I didn't want to do all the work only to find out it wouldn't work. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "no spam" wrote in message . net... I'm looking for plans for a simple AM antenna to connect to my stereo to replace the little loop antenna that came with it. In the past I have used long wires but they are not very directional. I have found some fairly good plans online for what looks like wire wound around a box but all of them seem to have potentiometer in the mix somewhere. It would be very little problem to build an aimable 18 to even 48 inch frame. I only have two AM stations I'd like to come in clearer (690 KHz and 1440 KHz). Would it be possible to make a 'box' with one 'tap' for 690 and one for 1440 then just connect one or the other the radio? How long would be wires need to be and how would I feed it into the connections on the radio (coax)? Like Richard says, it's easier to find an old cap, and build the loop around the cap. The old analog dial stereo receivers have some of the best variables for this purpose. Most are multi gang caps, which often can approach 1000 pf or more if you tie all the gangs together. This can be handy for wide freq use as you can use switches and switch gangs in or out of the circuit to change freq coverage. Most stereo caps also had a few small gangs with low pf values, good stuff cut) Almost anything is easy if you know how to do it. I was looking for something really simple w/o any electronic parts in it. I posted several URLs with plans for building a loop like the one you are talking about. I naively thought I might just be able to take piece of wire that was a fraction of the wavelength of the freq and wrap it around a frame and aim it in the correct direction. But I didn't want to do all the work only to find out it wouldn't work. OK: Start small. Identify a decent ground reasonably near the radio. Stretch as much wire as you can on a line away from the radio. Tie off (secure) the distant end as high and clear as possible. At the radio wrap, the free end of the wire around the radio several times near where the internal antenna is located. (The exact location can be easily found by any of several clever methods, not counting taking the back off.) Strip the insulation off the free end and attach it to the ground. I expect you will be gratified by the increase in signal strength. Caution, if you run this antenna near operating electrical/electronic equipment, you may pick up interference that will negate the increase in the desired signal. You will have to play with this. You may have to endure three or four unimpressive performances before you have that one kick-ass success that makes you let out a whoop. Life's like that. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "no spam" wrote in message news ![]() I'm looking for plans for a simple AM antenna to connect to my stereo to replace the little loop antenna that came with it. In the past I have used long wires but they are not very directional. I have found some fairly good plans online for what looks like wire wound around a box but all of them seem to have potentiometer in the mix somewhere. It would be very little problem to build an aimable 18 to even 48 inch frame. I only have two AM stations I'd like to come in clearer (690 KHz and 1440 KHz). Would it be possible to make a 'box' with one 'tap' for 690 and one for 1440 then just connect one or the other the radio? How long would be wires need to be and how would I feed it into the connections on the radio (coax)? 690 used to be for WAPE a clear channel 50KW station on Jacksonvile FL. I understand it a 10kw talk radio station now. Is this the 690 you are refering to. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm looking for plans for a simple AM antenna to connect to my stereo to replace the little loop antenna that came with it. In the past I have used long wires but they are not very directional. I have found some fairly good plans online for what looks like wire wound around a box but all of them seem to have potentiometer in the mix somewhere. It would be very little problem to build an aimable 18 to even 48 inch frame. I only have two AM stations I'd like to come in clearer (690 KHz and 1440 KHz). Would it be possible to make a 'box' with one 'tap' for 690 and one for 1440 then just connect one or the other the radio? How long would be wires need to be and how would I feed it into the connections on the radio (coax)? 690 used to be for WAPE a clear channel 50KW station on Jacksonvile FL. I understand it a 10kw talk radio station now. Is this the 690 you are refering to. Yes, 690 out of Jax and 1440 out of Brunswick. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question about receiving broadcast (AM/FM) radio | Equipment | |||
receiving HF antenna for urban conditions | Antenna | |||
What antenna for receiving video signal from ISS ? | Antenna | |||
Need some help designing a receiving antenna | Antenna | |||
Best Antenna for Receiving - NEWBIE | Antenna |