Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
VHF Ground plane radials
When making the standard VHF-UHF ground plane antenna as illustrated in
all the books, with four ground radials sloped down at a 45 degree angle, are those radials a tuned length? How much difference would it make if they were some random length considerably longer than specified? (as, for example, using the antenna on a different band by merely changing the center vertical element.) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
VHF Ground plane radials
The antenna you're describing is a dipole. Half of the dipole is the
upper vertical wire. The lower half is the radials. Changing the length of one half has the same general effect as changing the other half. Roy Lewallen, W7EL David Harmon wrote: When making the standard VHF-UHF ground plane antenna as illustrated in all the books, with four ground radials sloped down at a 45 degree angle, are those radials a tuned length? How much difference would it make if they were some random length considerably longer than specified? (as, for example, using the antenna on a different band by merely changing the center vertical element.) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
VHF Ground plane radials
If the ground radials go from 45 degree sloping downward to straight
horizontal, at what point does it become a ground plane and not a dipole? Roy Lewallen wrote: The antenna you're describing is a dipole. Half of the dipole is the upper vertical wire. The lower half is the radials. Changing the length of one half has the same general effect as changing the other half. Roy Lewallen, W7EL David Harmon wrote: When making the standard VHF-UHF ground plane antenna as illustrated in all the books, with four ground radials sloped down at a 45 degree angle, are those radials a tuned length? How much difference would it make if they were some random length considerably longer than specified? (as, for example, using the antenna on a different band by merely changing the center vertical element.) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
VHF Ground plane radials
On May 24, 1:14 am, Rick wrote:
If the ground radials go from 45 degree sloping downward to straight horizontal, at what point does it become a ground plane and not a dipole? Roy Lewallen wrote: The antenna you're describing is a dipole. Half of the dipole is the upper vertical wire. The lower half is the radials. Changing the length of one half has the same general effect as changing the other half. Roy Lewallen, W7EL David Harmon wrote: When making the standard VHF-UHF ground plane antenna as illustrated in all the books, with four ground radials sloped down at a 45 degree angle, are those radials a tuned length? How much difference would it make if they were some random length considerably longer than specified? (as, for example, using the antenna on a different band by merely changing the center vertical element.)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The antenna is not a dipole unless it has only one "radial". A ground plane is just that...several radials sloping and creating the surface seen by the vertical element. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
VHF Ground plane radials
On Thu, 24 May 2007 04:14:00 GMT, Rick wrote:
If the ground radials go from 45 degree sloping downward to straight horizontal, at what point does it become a ground plane and not a dipole? Hi Rick, It becomes a "ground plane" (as you think of it) only when you plant the radials (fully horizontal) into the ground - otherwise, with elevation, it is an elaborate vertical dipole. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
VHF Ground plane radials
It's unfortunate that so many people feel the need to divide antennas
like so many other things into binary categories. When the radials are horizontal, they radiate very little. As they're bent downward, they radiate more and more. So the transition, if you must have one, occurs wherever you want to consider the radiation to be "significant". But even a ground plane with horizontal radials behaves like a dipole in some respects, like current distribution. So if you make the radials longer, it has an effect on the current distribution that's similar to making the top longer, but in the opposite direction. And the impedance change caused by lengthening the radials is similar to that of lengthening the top. So in some ways it's still a dipole. The point I was hinting at is that calling ground plane radials "ground" doesn't impart magical properties to them. They are conductors with current flowing on them, so they create fields like any other conductors with currents. And the total current flowing in the radials is equal to the current flowing in the top wire. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Rick wrote: If the ground radials go from 45 degree sloping downward to straight horizontal, at what point does it become a ground plane and not a dipole? Roy Lewallen wrote: The antenna you're describing is a dipole. Half of the dipole is the upper vertical wire. The lower half is the radials. Changing the length of one half has the same general effect as changing the other half. Roy Lewallen, W7EL David Harmon wrote: When making the standard VHF-UHF ground plane antenna as illustrated in all the books, with four ground radials sloped down at a 45 degree angle, are those radials a tuned length? How much difference would it make if they were some random length considerably longer than specified? (as, for example, using the antenna on a different band by merely changing the center vertical element.) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
VHF Ground plane radials
Roy Lewallen wrote in
: .... The point I was hinting at is that calling ground plane radials "ground" doesn't impart magical properties to them. They are conductors with current flowing on them, so they create fields like any other conductors with currents. And the total current flowing in the radials is equal to the current flowing in the top wire. .... if you assume that no current flows on the feedline / mast, and it seems that doesn't happen by accident. Owen |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
VHF Ground plane radials
David Harmon wrote:
When making the standard VHF-UHF ground plane antenna as illustrated in all the books, with four ground radials sloped down at a 45 degree angle, are those radials a tuned length? How much difference would it make if they were some random length considerably longer than specified? (as, for example, using the antenna on a different band by merely changing the center vertical element.) So, these guys are telling you that the antenna you describe is a dipole? Funny, you call it a ground plane antenna (gpa) and I can draw a mental picture of exactly what you are attempting to build. If you had called it a dipole, I'd have expected the common half wave wire fed in the middle. You get my drift, nice to have two different names for the two vastly mechanically-differing constructions of metal and insulators. By the way, have you ever heard a yagi called a "Multiple Dipole Antenna Working in Tandem?" GRIN! As to your question, cut the radials ~5% longer than the vertical element, droop them at a angle which give you a good match to your 50 ohm coax (or ~45 degrees.) Better yet, consider a half wave end fed antenna which requires no counterpoise (radials, check out the radiation pattern of the halfwave endfed): http://www.70mhz.org/halfwav.htm Simply change dimensions to fit your freq(s), much easier to hang a single vertical wire in the air than one vertical and four horizontal--no matter what the freq. Best regards, JS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ground radials | Antenna | |||
In a ground plane, what dictates the number and spacing of radials? | Antenna | |||
Ground Radials - a new look! | Homebrew | |||
Ground Radials - a new look! | Boatanchors | |||
Ground Radials - a new look! | Equipment |