Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jimmie D wrote:
- Show quoted text - Pound to a penny that you never read the patent or comments given on this newsgroup in the mid 90s or even OWA descriptions You can always give me a pointer as to why it was "run of the mill" matching system or where the OWA was different, or all the same. Like all things new comments abound that "I already knew that" or "it is nothing special". What is it that you have against progress with respect to antennas? Seems like any opposition to " all is known about antennas" is a signal for attack Art in ham radio these days to keep the status quo! Art You lose, give me the pound.. I am SOOOOOO glad that I plonked Art. I recommend that everyone does it. tom K0TAR |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Austin Antenna Ferret Wideband Antenna | Swap | |||
FS: Icom R8500 Wideband Receiver + Austin Antenna Ferret Antenna | Swap | |||
Optimized G5RV | Antenna | |||
W7EL Optimized Transceiver | Homebrew | |||
W7EL Optimized Transceiver | Homebrew |