Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Jun, 06:50, "Mike Kaliski" wrote:
snip snip Art I have arrived at this thread rather late but it appears you believe that you have arrived at an idea for some kind of new antenna which works on the principle of Poyntings vector and Gaussian statics law. Correct Poyntings vector refers to the direction of motion of an electromagnetic wave is is frequently used to calculate power per square metre of an idealised wavefront impacting on an imaginary surface at an arbitary distance from an isotropic (single point) radiator. This figure can then be used to make a comparison with real life antennas to establish directions of preferential gain or loss. Correct Gaussian statistics refer to the distribution of typically, power over a given area or range. Generally more power is concentrated at the centre of a range with power falling symmetrically either side of a central high point. Correct, very muchlike a band pass filter Gaussian antennas are currently for sale and used as microwave horns to modify low intensity radar beams used in intruder detection and door opening systems. This ensures that the main lobe of power is directed to the most useful area of detection. These devices typically generate a beam in the form of a cone shape, with maximum intensity at the centre of the cone. True What you are proposing is a planar gaussian antenna which flattens the cone into more of a fan shape, displays a flat impedence over a wide bandwidth and requires around ten elements of different lengths mounted on a boom support. Incorrect. It is a cluster of elements in equilibrium where all elements are resonant as is the array in its entirety. I t all ha sbeen well defined in past postings on Gaussian antennas I could be wrong, but I believe that you have reinvented the log periodic antenna. Yes you are wrong This antenna has a single feedpoint, operates over typically 10:1 bandwidths with flat impedence and requires a minimum of ten elements to achieve reasonable gain and bandwidth. Log periodic antennae typically have as many as 30 elements. It was much favoured by the military for it's ability to transmit a directional beam on any discrete frequency across the whole of the HF spectrum. The advent of direct satellite communication equipment has rendered these antennae somewhat redundant because they are fairly large and require substantial towers and rotators to be used to maximum advantage. They are still used where reliable, frequency agile, point to point HF links are required. VHF and UHF versions would be small enough to be suitable for installation in a typical domestic garden. Correct No new maths or physics are required to explain how this type of antenna works and the principles have been well understood for over 50 years. A Google search for log periodic antenna should reveal a wealth of research material for you. I am quite familiar with the antenna concept. I had a long discussion with the inventor before he retired Also had a long discussion with Moxon at his last house on your side of the pond before he died. Both were a delight to discuss antennas with. snip Mike G0ULI- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Regards Art KB9MZ.....XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Announcing SwezeyDsp Upgrade! Use your PC to filter SWL audio in real time | Shortwave | |||
Here's the real time Gray Line (sorry) | Shortwave | |||
Real Time Gray Line Map | Shortwave | |||
Proof of Stevie Double Standard, if proof were really needed | Policy | |||
Almost real-time photos of Mt. St. Helen (volcano) | Shortwave |