Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 21st 07, 09:40 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Patent realities was Guy from university physics dept.

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:58:13 -0700, Jim Lux
wrote:

"Hey, we've got this patent application in the works, and YOU
don't know what's in it, and we're NOT going to tell you what's in it.
When the patent issues, we might be able to put you out of business.
Feel Lucky?"


In fact, the manufacturer is completely lucky. Their product line can
continue forever based on the design preceeding publication - even if
the design and the publication are the same. They just can't change
it.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #2   Report Post  
Old June 22nd 07, 12:42 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 801
Default Patent realities was Guy from university physics dept.

Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:58:13 -0700, Jim Lux
wrote:


"Hey, we've got this patent application in the works, and YOU
don't know what's in it, and we're NOT going to tell you what's in it.
When the patent issues, we might be able to put you out of business.
Feel Lucky?"



In fact, the manufacturer is completely lucky. Their product line can
continue forever based on the design preceeding publication - even if
the design and the publication are the same. They just can't change
it.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


It's the second mfr that's got the decision to make, and decide if
they're lucky. Here's the speculative scenario:

1) Mfr A invents something, files ap, keeps it secret
2) Mfr B invents same thing, but later
3) Mfr B starts making the thing
4) Mfr A gets their patent
5) Mfr B is instantly infringing, and can't continue mfr, distribution,
sale, etc., without a license from A.

If B knows that A has filed a patent in an area of B's interest
(potentially indicated by mfr A selling a product labelled Pat.Pend.),
they've got a real gamble when they invest in step #3.

B can negotiate in advance of patent issuance before step #4
OR
B can tell A to go away, gambling that
a)they won't infringe the unknown patent when it does issue
or b)that the patent won't issue
or c) A won't have the resources to take B on for infringement.

OR
B can wait for the patent to issue, then negotiate with A for a license.

The last strategy is particularly effective if, meanwhile B has filed
for or patented something that happens to be infringed by A's existing
mfr operation. They can cross license their patents. (happens all the
time in the semiconductor business)
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KB9RQZ Makes One Post After Another Then Claims Others Are LYING When His Own Words Are Quoted VERBATIM [email protected] Policy 3 September 26th 06 02:57 PM
the 'language' of physics GOSPELS FAR FROM THE TRUTH --Mor... [email protected] Shortwave 18 August 7th 05 03:59 AM
Physics according to toad Cmd Buzz Corey Policy 5 May 28th 05 05:57 PM
NY TIMES says new super-small Hammie Antenna defies physics Nicolai Carpathia CB 16 June 12th 04 09:08 PM
Ye canna change the lars o' physics Dave VanHorn CB 5 August 2nd 03 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017