LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old July 6th 07, 05:38 AM posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 58
Default AM electromagnetic waves: 20 KHz modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency

On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:37:21 -0700, Jim Kelley
wrote:

John Fields wrote:

You missed my point, which was that in a mixer (which the ear is,
since its amplitude response is nonlinear) as the two carriers
approach each other the difference frequency will go to zero and the
sum frequency will go to the second harmonic of either carrier,
making it largely appear to vanish into the fundamental.


Hi John -

Given two sources of pure sinusoidal tones whose individual amplitudes
are constant, is it your claim that you have heard the sum of the two
frequencies?


---
I think so.

A year or so ago I did some casual experiments with pure tones being
fed simultaneously into individual loudspeakers to which I listened,
and I recall that I heard tones which were higher pitched than
either of the lower-frequency signals. Subjective, I know, but
still...

A microphone with an amplitude response following that of the human
ear might do better.

Interestingly, this afternoon I did the zero-beat thing with 1kHz
being fed to one loudspeaker and a variable frequency oscillator
being fed to a separate loudspeaker, with me as the detector.

I also connected each oscillator to one channel of a Tektronix
2215A, inverted channel B, set the vertical amps to "ADD", and
adjusted the frequency of the VFO for near zero beat as shown on the
scope.

Sure enough, I heard the beat even though it came from different
sources, but I couldn't quite get it down to DC even with the
scope's trace at 0V.

Close, though, and as it turned out it wasn't the zero output
amplitude as shown by the scope which made the difference, it was
the amplitude of the signals which got to my ear(s). As fate would
have it, I have two ears, with some distance between them, so
perfect cancellation in one left some uncancelled signal in the
other, obviating what otherwise might have been perfect silence.
Except, perhaps, for the heterodynes.

Anyway, I'm off to the 75th reunion of the Panama Canal Society and
the 50th reunion of the Cristobal High School Class of '57 in
Orlando, so I'll see y'all when I get back on Sunday, GLW.


--
JF
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency Radium[_2_] Antenna 39 July 3rd 07 05:52 AM
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency Radium[_2_] Shortwave 17 July 3rd 07 05:37 AM
DC waves??? Magic frequency??? Peter O. Brackett Antenna 19 May 24th 07 10:07 PM
Electromagnetic frequency allocations in xml ? [email protected] General 0 December 10th 05 05:47 PM
Which digital readout receivers always show the carrier frequency no matter what mode? Richard Shortwave 5 December 5th 04 12:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017