Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 5, 9:38 pm, John Fields wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:37:21 -0700, Jim Kelley wrote: John Fields wrote: You missed my point, which was that in a mixer (which the ear is, since its amplitude response is nonlinear) as the two carriers approach each other the difference frequency will go to zero and the sum frequency will go to the second harmonic of either carrier, making it largely appear to vanish into the fundamental. Hi John - Given two sources of pure sinusoidal tones whose individual amplitudes are constant, is it your claim that you have heard the sum of the two frequencies? --- I think so. So if you have for example, a 300 Hz signal and a 400 Hz signal, your claim is that you also hear a 700 Hz signal? You'd better check again. All you should hear is a 300 Hz signal and a 400 Hz signal. The beat frequency is too high to be audible. (Note that if the beat frequency was a separate, difference signal as you suggest, at this frequency it would certainly be audible.) A year or so ago I did some casual experiments with pure tones being fed simultaneously into individual loudspeakers to which I listened, and I recall that I heard tones which were higher pitched than either of the lower-frequency signals. Subjective, I know, but still... Excessive cone excursion can produce significant 2nd harmonic distortion. But at normal volume levels your ear does not create sidebands, mixing products, or anything of the sort. It hears the same thing that is shown on both the oscilloscope and on the spectrum analyzer. Interestingly, this afternoon I did the zero-beat thing with 1kHz being fed to one loudspeaker and a variable frequency oscillator being fed to a separate loudspeaker, with me as the detector. My comments were based on my results in that experiment, common knowledge, and professional musical and audio experience. I also connected each oscillator to one channel of a Tektronix 2215A, inverted channel B, set the vertical amps to "ADD", and adjusted the frequency of the VFO for near zero beat as shown on the scope. Sure enough, I heard the beat even though it came from different sources, but I couldn't quite get it down to DC even with the scope's trace at 0V. Of course you heard beats. What you didn't hear is the sum of the frequencies. I've had the same setup on my bench for several months. It's also one of the experiments the students do in the first year physics labs. Someone had made the claim a while back that what we hear is the 'average' of the two frequencies. Didn't make any sense so I did the experiment. The results are as I have explained. jk |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|