Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 16, 11:30 pm, isw wrote:
In article .com, Keith Dysart wrote: No, that was indeed the claim. As a demonstration, I've attached a variant of your original LTspice simulation. Plot Vprod and Vsum. They are on top of each other. Plot the FFT for each. They are indistinguishable. -- lots o' snipping goin' on -- OK. I haven't been (had the patience to keep on) following this discussion, so I apologize if this is totally inappropriate, but If the statements above refer to creating that set of signals by using a bunch of signal generators, or alternately by using some sort of actual "modulation", the answer is, there is a very significant difference. In the case where the set is created by modulating the "carrier" with the low frequency, there is a very specific phase relationship between the signals which would be essentially impossible to achieve if the signals were to be generated independently. All true. The simulation offered previously achieves the required phase relationship (and more, so that the sum and product versions can be directly compared). In fact, the only difference between AM and FM/PM is that the phase relationship between the carrier and the sideband set differs by 90 degrees between the two. I am not convinced. Can you explain? AM modulation with a single frequency produces a single sum and difference for the sidebands while FM has an infinite number of frequencies in the sidebands. This does not seem like a simple phase difference. ....Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|