Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This explains the "Casimir Effect:"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir_effect This indicates that a sound method has been discovered to manipulate it: http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/21...ack-levitation Now, one can only speculate as to whether this will have possible effects on the design/implementation of future antennas ... or possibly lead to the "discovery" of new/"previously unknown" laws/forces which have been in play and beyond our vision. Regards, JS |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Smith I" wrote in message ... This explains the "Casimir Effect:" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir_effect This indicates that a sound method has been discovered to manipulate it: http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/21...ack-levitation Now, one can only speculate as to whether this will have possible effects on the design/implementation of future antennas ... or possibly lead to the "discovery" of new/"previously unknown" laws/forces which have been in play and beyond our vision. Regards, JS John So you tie an antenna wire to a gecko and get it to run up the nearest tall object? :-) Mike G0ULI |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Kaliski wrote:
... So you tie an antenna wire to a gecko and get it to run up the nearest tall object? :-) Mike G0ULI So? Your claim is the Casimir Effect only has domain over atomic sized particles and "possibly" larger? Interesting, I would take your bet ... if it affects atomic sized particles, it will be found to affect smaller; and bigger, I wonder? But, apparently, that/those questions are being posed ... Regards, JS |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Kaliski wrote:
So you tie an antenna wire to a gecko and get it to run up the nearest tall object? :-) Mike G0ULI Yanno? Come to think of it, if they really do have a crashed alien craft or two, and are reverse engineering 'em, you'd just have to expect something like this to develop somewhere at sometime; wouldn't ya? grin Regards, JS |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Smith I" wrote in message ... Mike Kaliski wrote: So you tie an antenna wire to a gecko and get it to run up the nearest tall object? :-) Mike G0ULI Yanno? Come to think of it, if they really do have a crashed alien craft or two, and are reverse engineering 'em, you'd just have to expect something like this to develop somewhere at sometime; wouldn't ya? grin Regards, JS Nah, the old methods are the best. 1. Attach antenna wire to gecko. 2. Get your gecko to climb as high as needed. 3. Key up with a kilowatt. 4. Antenna is now secured with lossy carbon resistor for a lovely wide bandwidth. Simple. Geckos have had sticky but dirt resistant feet for millennia. There was an announcement over a year ago that some new plastic compound had been developed to duplicate the effect. It all relies on the attraction between closely spaced molecules. I guess someone needed to find a method of peeling it off after it had stuck firmly. Applying an electromagnetic field in the correct manner would break the atomic level attraction between the materials. Don't know how the geckos do it though. Maybe they have a charge generator like an electric eel? Mike G0ULI |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Kaliski wrote:
... Mike G0ULI Well, I guess it is possible--the aliens could be stealing our technology; in much the same way as, we collect artifacts of primitive cultures ... Regards, JS |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Mike Kaliski michael.kaliski(remove wrote: Nah, the old methods are the best. 1. Attach antenna wire to gecko. 2. Get your gecko to climb as high as needed. 3. Key up with a kilowatt. 4. Antenna is now secured with lossy carbon resistor for a lovely wide bandwidth. Is that... roasted newt?!?!? -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 09:08:07 -0700, John Smith I
wrote: This explains the "Casimir Effect:" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir_effect This indicates that a sound method has been discovered to manipulate it: http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/21...ack-levitation Remember Pons and Fleishman? Now, one can only speculate as to whether this will have possible effects on the design/implementation of future antennas ... or possibly lead to the "discovery" of new/"previously unknown" laws/forces which have been in play and beyond our vision. Gad, just what we need is more existential fodder for Arthur (except you leaped to an antenna connection before he could opine "throw away the text books"). Future nano antennas? At this scale, there is nothing so amusing as those in, over their heads. It may shock many to discover that resonance becomes decoupled from scaling at this -um- scale. This isn't your dad's quarterwave monopole anymore. Another message from Western Union, the Casimir effect was well known CENTURIES ago to sailors. It was only myopic scientists who re-discovered it under their microscope and put a label to it in spite of this common knowledge. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
Another message from Western Union, the Casimir effect was well known CENTURIES ago to sailors. It was only myopic scientists who re-discovered it under their microscope and put a label to it in spite of this common knowledge. Centuries ago it was nearly impossible for sailors to find anyone who would publish their nanoelectronics research. :-) ac6xg |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Centuries ago it was nearly impossible for sailors to find anyone who would publish their nanoelectronics research. :-) ac6xg Jim: I am busting a gut here, the humor is greatly appreciated. Regards, JS |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antennas future | Antenna | |||
Stealing Knowledge ! | Shortwave | |||
The impact of the abolishment of CW in France | Policy | |||
FT-100D question: Is ALC a good indication of modulation? | Equipment | |||
FT-100D question: Is ALC a good indication of modulation? | Equipment |