Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 12th 04, 04:51 PM
Dave Shrader
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill Turner wrote:

SNIP

And finally, don't be persuaded by that old saying about how a two
element quad is equal to a three element yagi. So what? A three
element yagi is FAR easier to build than a two element quad.

The bottom line is this: Once the quad is up in the air, it will
generally outperform a yagi of equivalent cost. The problems lie in
getting it up in the air and keeping it there.

If I had it all to do over again, starting from scratch, I probably
would use a yagi.

--
73, Bill W6WRT
QSLs via LoTW


And, I would use a Log Periodic!! I give up about 1 dB in gain and
acquire a 13.5 MHz to 33 MHz broadband antenna, no traps, full legal
power handling capability and a VSWR 2:1 across the full range. That
means 20, 17, 15, 12 and 10 meters all in ONE Beam.

W1MCE

  #2   Report Post  
Old February 14th 04, 09:35 PM
J. McLaughlin
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It depends on what one wishes to accomplish and how long one expects the
antenna to endure.
It is assumed that the antenna is designed to survive the pressure
due to the expected peak wind velocity (at the height where it is
mounted) and expected radial ice loading. [See EIA 222F or G]
For near maximum performance on a single band (or set of single
bands) with a tower that is at least one wavelength high, a yagi with at
least three elements is hard to beat - especially if one mounts
additional antennas on the same rotating mast.

For about 1 to 2 db less than what can be achieved with a (single
band) yagi, and perhaps that much more than many triband beams, - on a
tower that is at least one wavelength high at the lowest frequency - one
may cover all of the HF bands from 14 MHz up with one LPDA (log
periodic). In my opinion, on the higher HF bands, most radio amateurs
will be best served with a LPDA in view of the span of frequencies now
available and the lack of a need to tweak well designed examples of such
antennas.
73 Mac N8TT

--
J. Mc Laughlin - Michigan USA

"Dave Shrader" wrote in
snip

And, I would use a Log Periodic!! I give up about 1 dB in gain and
acquire a 13.5 MHz to 33 MHz broadband antenna, no traps, full legal
power handling capability and a VSWR 2:1 across the full range. That
means 20, 17, 15, 12 and 10 meters all in ONE Beam.

W1MCE


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HY-Gain 20 meter yagi Mel Antenna 1 May 7th 09 06:06 PM
Compact Yagi Design for VHF????????????????????????? Dr. Slick Antenna 7 February 9th 04 12:40 AM
Mechanically rotating your yagi to change polarization Richard Antenna 15 December 27th 03 01:42 PM
Matching 70 cm Yagi to coax feedline MikeN Antenna 6 September 1st 03 11:32 PM
6m Yagi Jason Dugas Antenna 7 July 14th 03 03:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017