| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quad advantages: 1. Simple. Only wires and coax. No baluns, traps, gammas, hairpins, etc. Full legal power continuously with no problems. A yagi can be made with a direct dipole feed, which is very simple. BOTH the quad and yagi need a balun. 2. Broadband. Covers 20/15/10 with less than 2:1 SWR, even on 10. See Cebik's studies of quads (www.cebik.com). Quads give a very narrow front/back bandwidth. Not enough even to cover most amateur bands with = 20 dB F/B. 3. Light. For a given level of performance, a quad should be a bit lighter than a yagi. True for a 2 element quad (boomless), but not with more elements. Look at some of the weights at http://www.mgs4u.com/catalog/. Torsten N4OGW |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| HY-Gain 20 meter yagi | Antenna | |||
| Compact Yagi Design for VHF????????????????????????? | Antenna | |||
| Mechanically rotating your yagi to change polarization | Antenna | |||
| Matching 70 cm Yagi to coax feedline | Antenna | |||
| 6m Yagi | Antenna | |||