Quantum Tunneling
 

On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:26:46 -0700, John Smith I
wrote:

an endeavor to make you appear as an idiot

Odd how you choose your frame so carefully. The passive presumption
is truly evocative of wish-fulfillment. Sort of like "I'll hold your
coat while you beat them up" toadyist self contempt.

Got any more charmers like that scribbled in your secret diary?

Try reading the original text instead of relying on the Classics
Comics edition if you want your indignation to bluster more than Rocky
Balboa in a wheelchair.

Yeah, I know this was all for my benefit. ;-0

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Quantum Tunneling
 

John Smith I wrote:

Whatever mental disorder these guys have, I am afraid it may be caused
by rf--I am thinking of swearing off amateur radio and going wholly with
the net--before it is too late!

If you do, please consider swearing off the the amateur radio
newsgroups too while you're at it.

Much appreciated.

ac6xg

Quantum Tunneling
 

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
. ..
Jimmie D wrote:
tunneling doesnt take faster than light speed to explain, only that there
are more than three dimensions to space. In some dimension the begining
and end was not as far apart as the scientist thought they were. In other
words you dont travel faster than light, you just take a short cut.

Beam me up, Scottie, and engage at Warp 6.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

The universe is probably a lot stranger than you or I think it is.

Jimmie

Quantum Tunneling
 

Richard Clark wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:26:46 -0700, John Smith I
wrote:

an endeavor to make you appear as an idiot

Odd how you choose your frame so carefully. The passive presumption
is truly evocative of wish-fulfillment. Sort of like "I'll hold your
coat while you beat them up" toadyist self contempt.

Got any more charmers like that scribbled in your secret diary?

Try reading the original text instead of relying on the Classics
Comics edition if you want your indignation to bluster more than Rocky
Balboa in a wheelchair.

Yeah, I know this was all for my benefit. ;-0

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

My text is either true on not, it holds no secret knife, it is the
weapon itself. I am sure some may get lost in analysis ...

What I write only looks obvious to me, I simply offer my humble opinion,
it is either true, or not ... the world is a much better judge than
myself ...

Regards,
JS

Quantum Tunneling
 

Jim Kelley wrote:

...
If you do, please consider swearing off the the amateur radio newsgroups
too while you're at it.

Much appreciated.

ac6xg



Jim:

:-)

JS

Quantum Tunneling
 

Jimmie D wrote:

The universe is probably a lot stranger than you or I think it is.

Yet much less strange than some other people think it is.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Quantum Tunneling
 

Jimmie D wrote:

...
The universe is probably a lot stranger than you or I think it is.

Jimmie

Well said, and that ain't the half of it; a lot of amateurs are a lot
stranger than I am comfortable with! :-)

Regards,
JS

Quantum Tunneling
 

Richard Clark wrote:

...
73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Yanno, my first response, which preceded this one, was rather cryptic.
This link embodies my meaning:

http://blog.hamdems.org/archives/028648.html

Now, simply think of me as the guy who cries out, "These amateurs wear
NO clothes!"

Regards,
JS

Quantum Tunneling
 

On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:58:56 -0700, John Smith I
wrote:

My text is either true on not, it holds no secret knife, it is the
weapon itself.

Wow! Harlequin may sue you for copyright violation though. (Do they
have a Quantum Electrodynamics series for young romantics you've been
tipping into? Gives an entirely new spin on tunneling.)

Quantum Tunneling
 

Richard Clark wrote:

...
Wow! Harlequin may sue you for copyright violation though. (Do they
have a Quantum Electrodynamics series for young romantics you've been
tipping into? Gives an entirely new spin on tunneling.)

LOL! At least Harlequin doesn't reprint shakespeare!

As happens quite often, I view my "crystal ball" and I must agree to
disagree.

To me, it is quite clear, we have only kludged together "theories" and
equations which we slave with (but, are quite usable till better comes
along), we use these under the burden of great errors and unsolved
riddles ... to others, it may indeed appear as a finished work of art ...

Regards,
JS